Although all eyes were on Tuesday’s meeting between Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) General Secretary Xi Jinping (習近平), a few incidents that took place before the meeting boded ill for anyone who expected the KMT to demonstrate values that would show that as a party from democratic Taiwan it was different from the CCP.
Reporters from the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper), Taiwanese online media outlet Up Media and the Taiwan office of Hong Kong’s Mirror Weekly were allowed to enter China for the annual KMT-CCP Cross-strait Peace Development Forum. However, on Monday they received calls from China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) informing them that their press passes for the Hung-Xi meeting had been revoked because of “limited space.”
“Limited space” is not a convincing excuse, especially when all the reporters had registered with the TAO. Even if it was a legitimate reason, why those three outlets were excluded was never specified. The Chinese authorities must believe — as they always do — that they are not obliged to provide credible explanations for the decisions they make, however arbitrary.
While the Chinese government’s arbitrariness and low transparency are a given, the KMT — which for years touted itself as the rightful ruler of a “free China” and now claims to represent the people of a democratized Taiwan — should not view it as a norm.
And yet, from what is known, the KMT has failed to lodge any formal protest with Beijing for restricting Taiwanese reporters’ rights. Worse still, KMT Central Policy Committee executive director Alex Tsai (蔡正元) on Monday brushed the matter aside, saying it “had nothing to do with freedom of press” because “many other media outlets were allowed to report on [the meeting],” so the information was transparent enough for the public.
He said the TAO had “also placed restrictions on the [Chinese] media,” according to the Central News Agency.
Tsai’s response was absurd. He proposed redefining the freedom of the press, gladly buying the Chinese authority’s justification. He surely knew that the Chinese-language Apple Daily’s reporters’ permit requests in China have repeatedly been rejected by Beijing. This time was no exception, as its reporters reportedly traveled to Beijing on tourist visas.
Since when does picking media outlets you favor to print your news fall short of being a freedom of the press violation?
Tsai’s “Chinese media also got blocked” pretext is all the more infuriating and appalling because it is well known that Beijing has been persecuting Chinese reporters and imposing censorship on the nation’s press and publishing industry. Is the fact that Chinese journalists have constantly suffered from government intervention really a good justification, in Tsai’s eyes, for an arbitrary dismissal that should be universally condemned?
It also turned out that the start of the Hung-Xi meeting was changed from 3pm to 4pm, reportedly because the CCP was not happy that the KMT on Monday unilaterally announced the meeting time.
The KMT also probably did not object when a person waving a Republic of China flag in Nanjing was escorted away by the police.
Trivial as these incidents might seem, they show that the KMT is completely under the sway of Beijing, which is sad to witness for those who remember how it once fervently trumpeted an anti-CCP mantra, believing it could replace the CCP one day.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
RSS