Although all eyes were on Tuesday’s meeting between Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) General Secretary Xi Jinping (習近平), a few incidents that took place before the meeting boded ill for anyone who expected the KMT to demonstrate values that would show that as a party from democratic Taiwan it was different from the CCP.
Reporters from the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper), Taiwanese online media outlet Up Media and the Taiwan office of Hong Kong’s Mirror Weekly were allowed to enter China for the annual KMT-CCP Cross-strait Peace Development Forum. However, on Monday they received calls from China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) informing them that their press passes for the Hung-Xi meeting had been revoked because of “limited space.”
“Limited space” is not a convincing excuse, especially when all the reporters had registered with the TAO. Even if it was a legitimate reason, why those three outlets were excluded was never specified. The Chinese authorities must believe — as they always do — that they are not obliged to provide credible explanations for the decisions they make, however arbitrary.
While the Chinese government’s arbitrariness and low transparency are a given, the KMT — which for years touted itself as the rightful ruler of a “free China” and now claims to represent the people of a democratized Taiwan — should not view it as a norm.
And yet, from what is known, the KMT has failed to lodge any formal protest with Beijing for restricting Taiwanese reporters’ rights. Worse still, KMT Central Policy Committee executive director Alex Tsai (蔡正元) on Monday brushed the matter aside, saying it “had nothing to do with freedom of press” because “many other media outlets were allowed to report on [the meeting],” so the information was transparent enough for the public.
He said the TAO had “also placed restrictions on the [Chinese] media,” according to the Central News Agency.
Tsai’s response was absurd. He proposed redefining the freedom of the press, gladly buying the Chinese authority’s justification. He surely knew that the Chinese-language Apple Daily’s reporters’ permit requests in China have repeatedly been rejected by Beijing. This time was no exception, as its reporters reportedly traveled to Beijing on tourist visas.
Since when does picking media outlets you favor to print your news fall short of being a freedom of the press violation?
Tsai’s “Chinese media also got blocked” pretext is all the more infuriating and appalling because it is well known that Beijing has been persecuting Chinese reporters and imposing censorship on the nation’s press and publishing industry. Is the fact that Chinese journalists have constantly suffered from government intervention really a good justification, in Tsai’s eyes, for an arbitrary dismissal that should be universally condemned?
It also turned out that the start of the Hung-Xi meeting was changed from 3pm to 4pm, reportedly because the CCP was not happy that the KMT on Monday unilaterally announced the meeting time.
The KMT also probably did not object when a person waving a Republic of China flag in Nanjing was escorted away by the police.
Trivial as these incidents might seem, they show that the KMT is completely under the sway of Beijing, which is sad to witness for those who remember how it once fervently trumpeted an anti-CCP mantra, believing it could replace the CCP one day.
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS