The 39th International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Assembly under way in Montreal ends tomorrow. Taiwan was invited to attend the last ICAO Assembly in 2013, but its participation did not continue this year, likely due to opposition from Beijing.
The government has conveyed the diplomatic efforts it made to attend the assembly and highlighted the importance of Taiwan’s inclusion for global aviation safety, yet, commentaries have not moved further to capture the global narratives during the assembly and reflect on Taiwan’s possible policy responses.
The first and most salient feature of recent assembly meetings is that concerns over the environmental impact of global aviation have gradually risen. Although the objectives of ICAO under Article 44 of the Chicago Convention do not have any direct reference to the environment, the Kyoto Protocol did task ICAO to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the aviation industry.
Ever since then, ICAO has been in the process of adopting a carbon emissions standard for the aviation industry. One of the critical outcomes of this year’s assembly is to finalize a global market-based measure (MBM) scheme for the sector’s carbon-neutral growth from the 2020 target. The results can be seen as a key test of global willingness to truly implement the climate commitment after last year’s Paris Agreement.
Second, there is a common perception that the aviation industry has become influential in ICAO’s rulemaking process. Historically, the connection between ICAO and some industry trade associations, such as the International Air Transport Association (IATA), is strong, and one of IATA’s own objectives is to cooperate with ICAO.
The assembly took into account the proposal of the aviation industry to draft the new global MBM scheme. ICAO’s Legal Committee even considered a recommendation to release the procedural restriction on the participation of industry observers. Critics have said that ICAO echoes the industry’s interests far too obviously.
Third, given that climate change is a complicated realm characterized by various conflicting interests, participation without civil society could result in a serious regulatory bias. Environmental non-governmental organizations could counterbalance the influence of economic interest groups and the predominant transport-oriented culture in global aviation affairs.
The International Coalition on Sustainable Aviation, an environmental non-governmental organization umbrella group, is the official civil society observer to ICAO. The coalition is currently running a global campaign, FlightPath 1.5, dedicated to cutting aviation pollution and ensuring that the proposed MBM deal is not just a low bar for an international climate agreement.
To benefit from the future aviation carbon offsetting scheme, a solid starting point for Taiwan is to voluntarily draft its own state action plan and adjust the related domestic institutional setting accordingly, such as Taiwan’s national greenhouse gas cap-and-trade scheme established by the Greenhouse Gas Reduction and Management Act (溫室氣體減量及管理法) last year. The state action plan, suggested in the 37th Assembly, essentially seeks to induce ICAO’s member states to monitor their aviation emissions and outline measures to address their carbon footprint.
For future industrial participation and other “bottom-up” approaches, Taiwan might enhance coordination with major airlines within IATA and harness the resources for capacity building and future collaboration with the targeted non-governmental organizations.
Yang Chung-han is a doctoral researcher at the Centre for Environment, Energy and Natural Resource Governance at the University of Cambridge.
China badly misread Japan. It sought to intimidate Tokyo into silence on Taiwan. Instead, it has achieved the opposite by hardening Japanese resolve. By trying to bludgeon a major power like Japan into accepting its “red lines” — above all on Taiwan — China laid bare the raw coercive logic of compellence now driving its foreign policy toward Asian states. From the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China Seas to the Himalayan frontier, Beijing has increasingly relied on economic warfare, diplomatic intimidation and military pressure to bend neighbors to its will. Confident in its growing power, China appeared to believe
After more than three weeks since the Honduran elections took place, its National Electoral Council finally certified the new president of Honduras. During the campaign, the two leading contenders, Nasry Asfura and Salvador Nasralla, who according to the council were separated by 27,026 votes in the final tally, promised to restore diplomatic ties with Taiwan if elected. Nasralla refused to accept the result and said that he would challenge all the irregularities in court. However, with formal recognition from the US and rapid acknowledgment from key regional governments, including Argentina and Panama, a reversal of the results appears institutionally and politically
In 2009, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) made a welcome move to offer in-house contracts to all outsourced employees. It was a step forward for labor relations and the enterprise facing long-standing issues around outsourcing. TSMC founder Morris Chang (張忠謀) once said: “Anything that goes against basic values and principles must be reformed regardless of the cost — on this, there can be no compromise.” The quote is a testament to a core belief of the company’s culture: Injustices must be faced head-on and set right. If TSMC can be clear on its convictions, then should the Ministry of Education
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) provided several reasons for military drills it conducted in five zones around Taiwan on Monday and yesterday. The first was as a warning to “Taiwanese independence forces” to cease and desist. This is a consistent line from the Chinese authorities. The second was that the drills were aimed at “deterrence” of outside military intervention. Monday’s announcement of the drills was the first time that Beijing has publicly used the second reason for conducting such drills. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leadership is clearly rattled by “external forces” apparently consolidating around an intention to intervene. The targets of
RSS