Aug. 15 just passed a few days ago. What is so special about that?
Aug. 15, 1945, was the day Japan surrendered, effectively ending World War II. In Japan, it marks the end of the war; South Korea calls it Liberation Day; and, in North Korea, it is called Liberation of Fatherland Day.
Taiwan, which was also colonized by Japan, did not develop a historical understanding of the date as marking the end of the war until the 1990s, when former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was mayor of Taipei. Prior to that, the event was seen through the blurry Chinese lens of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), which conflated it with China’s War of Resistance Against Japan. In the KMT’s and the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) China, Sept. 3 marks the day of victory over Japan. In Taiwan, it is called Armed Forces Day.
Calling it “armistice day” would be in line with Japan’s view, but it is also a neutral term as far as Taiwan is concerned. If Taiwan has its own subjective identity, if it is a country, then it should follow the example of Seoul and Pyongyang. Following the Japanese or Chinese definition— whether it be the definition of KMT/Nationalist China or CCP/Communist China — just shows how confused Taiwan is about its history.
The time between Aug. 15 and Oct. 25, 1945 was a period of confusion during which Taiwan descended from liberation into subjugation. Taiwan, which lacked its own national identity, was enveloped in the confusion surrounding the motherland. Korea, which was colonized by Japan from 1910 and 1945, had left and right-wing movements.
Former South Korea president Syngman Rhee and North Korean founder Kim Il-sung asked the KMT and the CCP for help, and although Korea split into North and South, the two remain independent countries.
What about Taiwan? Among idealistic Taiwanese who felt that China was the motherland turned to either the KMT or the CCP, with the result that Taiwan was thrown into a struggle between the two parties, a struggle that remains unsettled.
Taiwanese who welcomed the motherland were liberated on Aug. 15, 1945, only to fall under someone else’s control again on Oct. 25 the same year, when the Nationalist army came to Taiwan to accept the Japanese surrender on behalf of the Allies and proceeded to occupy Taiwan.
Following the 228 Incident in 1947, the government saw an opportunity to eliminate Taiwanese intellectuals and cultural personalities to strengthen its hold on power. In 1949, the KMT was thrown out of China by the CCP, and this was followed in Taiwan by the White Terror era and one of the world’s longest periods of martial law, all to consolidate the KMT’s hold on power.
The KMT, which managed to survive thanks to its resistance to the CCP, later reacted to the move toward democracy by joining hands with China in trying to suppress Taiwan, temporarily extending its failing existence. Taiwan, still lacking a national identity, continues to search for a way forward.
Aug. 15, 1945, was a day of liberation and independence for many former colonies around the world. These new countries have had their ups and downs, but they have been trying to find a way forward as countries with their own national identity.
If Taiwan on Aug. 15, 1945, had chosen to join the ranks of newly independent states, we would not have the current Chinese problem. Although there would have been opposition between the left and the right, as an independent country, Taiwan would not be trapped between KMT and CCP China. Instead, we would probably have had our own politics, economy and culture. We must not repeat the mistakes of history, and all of us who live in Taiwan today must be aware of our past history.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Perry Svensson
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In the opening remarks of her meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Friday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) framed her visit as a historic occasion. In his own remarks, Xi had also emphasized the history of the relationship between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Where they differed was that Cheng’s account, while flawed by its omissions, at least partially corresponded to reality. The meeting was certainly historic, albeit not in the way that Cheng and Xi were signaling, and not from the perspective
RSS