Upon taking office as president in 1988, Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) appointed former chief of the general staff and minister of national defense Hau Pei-tsun (郝柏村) as premier, sparking fears of military interference in the government. Hau later stepped down after he was found to have been holding military meetings at the Executive Yuan despite his position as premier.
It is generally believed that Hau’s appointment as premier was a politically calculated move to take away his clout over the military. Likewise, Lee’s decision to replace then-premier Lee Huan (李煥) with Hau was viewed as a politically motivated move.
In a way, politics is all about nimble maneuvering: Politicians are valued for their resourcefulness when they effectively employ tactics that suit their purposes. That was how politics worked when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) dominated the nation.
When Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) assumed the presidency in 2000, he appointed then-minister of national defense Tang Fei (唐飛) as premier. Tang was a retired air force general and had served as chief of the general staff, in addition to being defense minister.
Some viewed the appointment as a clever move to help the minority government gain further control over the military and stabilize the political situation following the transition of power to the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
However, Tang stepped down after discord between him and Chen over the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant project. After all, he was a longstanding member of the KMT. His departure caused some political instability, and it seemed there had been a transition of power in name only.
The KMT’s decades-long party-state rule has left many problems in Taiwanese politics, frustrating those seeking change. The party bureaucracy and the party-state ideology the KMT has inculcated in the military are still causing problems today.
Since 2008, then-president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) allowed the KMT to operate in a way that is unusual for a democratic country, as the party stuck to its old ways. Ma was merciless when he had a chance to settle old scores with officials from the Chen administration. He exploited the judicial system for his own political interests. Not even Chen could escape his claws: Chen was punished for being president when the position should have gone to a KMT politician.
Ma attacked his political enemies by calling them corrupt, while hiding behind a facade of honesty that he built for himself, although the public never really believed it.
As President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) pushed for judicial reform, her nominees for Judicial Yuan president and vice president met with criticism and objections. While this is the second time a party other than the KMT has been elected to rule Taiwan, Tsai’s recruitment choices are far from refreshing.
Tsai has been accused of allowing too many KMT members to remain in government, amid concern that this could give the KMT an opportunity to take all the credit while leaving the ruling party to shoulder all the blame for any policy missteps.
Why has creating a multiparty system been so difficult? Did the DPP’s landslide victory in the January presidential and legislative elections not indicate that Taiwanese are yearning for something different from the KMT’s troubling rule? Should the allocation of responsibility not change as the ruling party changes?
A lot more is expected of Tsai than what was expected of Chen, since she is governing with a legislative majority and full control over many local governments. A new vision cannot originate from old people in an old political system: There must be change.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Tu Yu-an
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
A recent Taipei Times editorial (“A targeted bilingual policy,” March 12, page 8) questioned how the Ministry of Education can justify spending NT$151 million (US$4.74 million) when the spotlighted achievements are English speech competitions and campus tours. It is a fair question, but it focuses on the wrong issue. The problem is not last year’s outcomes failing to meet the bilingual education vision; the issue is that the ministry has abandoned the program that originally justified such a large expenditure. In the early years of Bilingual 2030, the ministry’s K-12 Administration promoted the Bilingual Instruction in Select Domains Program (部分領域課程雙語教學實施計畫).
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) earlier this month said it is necessary for her to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and it would be a “huge boost” to the party’s local election results in November, but many KMT members have expressed different opinions, indicating a struggle between different groups in the party. Since Cheng was elected as party chairwoman in October last year, she has repeatedly expressed support for increased exchanges with China, saying that it would bring peace and prosperity to Taiwan, and that a meeting with Xi in Beijing takes priority over meeting
Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs spokesman for maritime affairs Rogelio Villanueva on Monday said that Manila’s claims in the South China Sea are backed by international law. Villanueva was responding to a social media post by the Chinese embassy alleging that a former Philippine ambassador in 1990 had written a letter to a German radio operator stating that the Scarborough Shoal (Huangyan Island, 黃岩島) did not fall within Manila’s territory. “Sovereignty is not merely claimed, it is exercised,” Villanueva said. The Philippines won a landmark case at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in 2016 that found China’s sweeping claim of sovereignty in
RSS