Upon taking office as president in 1988, Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) appointed former chief of the general staff and minister of national defense Hau Pei-tsun (郝柏村) as premier, sparking fears of military interference in the government. Hau later stepped down after he was found to have been holding military meetings at the Executive Yuan despite his position as premier.
It is generally believed that Hau’s appointment as premier was a politically calculated move to take away his clout over the military. Likewise, Lee’s decision to replace then-premier Lee Huan (李煥) with Hau was viewed as a politically motivated move.
In a way, politics is all about nimble maneuvering: Politicians are valued for their resourcefulness when they effectively employ tactics that suit their purposes. That was how politics worked when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) dominated the nation.
When Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) assumed the presidency in 2000, he appointed then-minister of national defense Tang Fei (唐飛) as premier. Tang was a retired air force general and had served as chief of the general staff, in addition to being defense minister.
Some viewed the appointment as a clever move to help the minority government gain further control over the military and stabilize the political situation following the transition of power to the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
However, Tang stepped down after discord between him and Chen over the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant project. After all, he was a longstanding member of the KMT. His departure caused some political instability, and it seemed there had been a transition of power in name only.
The KMT’s decades-long party-state rule has left many problems in Taiwanese politics, frustrating those seeking change. The party bureaucracy and the party-state ideology the KMT has inculcated in the military are still causing problems today.
Since 2008, then-president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) allowed the KMT to operate in a way that is unusual for a democratic country, as the party stuck to its old ways. Ma was merciless when he had a chance to settle old scores with officials from the Chen administration. He exploited the judicial system for his own political interests. Not even Chen could escape his claws: Chen was punished for being president when the position should have gone to a KMT politician.
Ma attacked his political enemies by calling them corrupt, while hiding behind a facade of honesty that he built for himself, although the public never really believed it.
As President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) pushed for judicial reform, her nominees for Judicial Yuan president and vice president met with criticism and objections. While this is the second time a party other than the KMT has been elected to rule Taiwan, Tsai’s recruitment choices are far from refreshing.
Tsai has been accused of allowing too many KMT members to remain in government, amid concern that this could give the KMT an opportunity to take all the credit while leaving the ruling party to shoulder all the blame for any policy missteps.
Why has creating a multiparty system been so difficult? Did the DPP’s landslide victory in the January presidential and legislative elections not indicate that Taiwanese are yearning for something different from the KMT’s troubling rule? Should the allocation of responsibility not change as the ruling party changes?
A lot more is expected of Tsai than what was expected of Chen, since she is governing with a legislative majority and full control over many local governments. A new vision cannot originate from old people in an old political system: There must be change.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Tu Yu-an
Taiwan should reject two flawed answers to the Eswatini controversy: that diplomatic allies no longer matter, or that they must be preserved at any cost. The sustainable answer is to maintain formal diplomatic relations while redesigning development relationships around transparency, local ownership and democratic accountability. President William Lai’s (賴清德) canceled trip to Eswatini has elicited two predictable reactions in Taiwan. One camp has argued that the episode proves Taiwan must double down on support for every remaining diplomatic ally, because Beijing is tightening the screws, and formal recognition is too scarce to risk. The other says the opposite: If maintaining
India’s semiconductor strategy is undergoing a quiet, but significant, recalibration. With the rollout of India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) 2.0, New Delhi is signaling a shift away from ambition-driven leaps toward a more grounded, capability-led approach rooted in industrial realities and institutional learning. Rather than attempting to enter the most advanced nodes immediately, India has chosen to prioritize mature technologies in the 28-nanometer to 65-nanometer range. That would not be a retreat, but a strategic alignment with domestic capabilities, market demand and global supply chain gaps. The shift carries the imprimatur of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, indicating that the recalibration is
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), during an interview for the podcast Lanshuan Time (蘭萱時間) released on Monday, said that a US professor had said that she deserved to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize following her meeting earlier this month with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Cheng’s “journey of peace” has garnered attention from overseas and from within Taiwan. The latest My Formosa poll, conducted last week after the Cheng-Xi meeting, shows that Cheng’s approval rating is 31.5 percent, up 7.6 percentage points compared with the month before. The same poll showed that 44.5 percent of respondents
China last week announced that it picked two Pakistani astronauts for its Tiangong space station mission, indicating the maturation of the two nations’ relationship from terrestrial infrastructure cooperation to extraterrestrial strategic domains. For Taiwan and India, the developments present an opportunity for democratic collaboration in space, particularly regarding dual-use technologies and the normative frameworks for outer space governance. Sino-Pakistani space cooperation dates back to the end of the Cold War in the 1990s, with a cooperative agreement between the Pakistani Space & Upper Atmosphere Research Commission, and the Chinese Ministry of Aerospace Industry. Space cooperation was integrated into the China-Pakistan
RSS