Upon taking office as president in 1988, Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) appointed former chief of the general staff and minister of national defense Hau Pei-tsun (郝柏村) as premier, sparking fears of military interference in the government. Hau later stepped down after he was found to have been holding military meetings at the Executive Yuan despite his position as premier.
It is generally believed that Hau’s appointment as premier was a politically calculated move to take away his clout over the military. Likewise, Lee’s decision to replace then-premier Lee Huan (李煥) with Hau was viewed as a politically motivated move.
In a way, politics is all about nimble maneuvering: Politicians are valued for their resourcefulness when they effectively employ tactics that suit their purposes. That was how politics worked when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) dominated the nation.
When Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) assumed the presidency in 2000, he appointed then-minister of national defense Tang Fei (唐飛) as premier. Tang was a retired air force general and had served as chief of the general staff, in addition to being defense minister.
Some viewed the appointment as a clever move to help the minority government gain further control over the military and stabilize the political situation following the transition of power to the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
However, Tang stepped down after discord between him and Chen over the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant project. After all, he was a longstanding member of the KMT. His departure caused some political instability, and it seemed there had been a transition of power in name only.
The KMT’s decades-long party-state rule has left many problems in Taiwanese politics, frustrating those seeking change. The party bureaucracy and the party-state ideology the KMT has inculcated in the military are still causing problems today.
Since 2008, then-president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) allowed the KMT to operate in a way that is unusual for a democratic country, as the party stuck to its old ways. Ma was merciless when he had a chance to settle old scores with officials from the Chen administration. He exploited the judicial system for his own political interests. Not even Chen could escape his claws: Chen was punished for being president when the position should have gone to a KMT politician.
Ma attacked his political enemies by calling them corrupt, while hiding behind a facade of honesty that he built for himself, although the public never really believed it.
As President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) pushed for judicial reform, her nominees for Judicial Yuan president and vice president met with criticism and objections. While this is the second time a party other than the KMT has been elected to rule Taiwan, Tsai’s recruitment choices are far from refreshing.
Tsai has been accused of allowing too many KMT members to remain in government, amid concern that this could give the KMT an opportunity to take all the credit while leaving the ruling party to shoulder all the blame for any policy missteps.
Why has creating a multiparty system been so difficult? Did the DPP’s landslide victory in the January presidential and legislative elections not indicate that Taiwanese are yearning for something different from the KMT’s troubling rule? Should the allocation of responsibility not change as the ruling party changes?
A lot more is expected of Tsai than what was expected of Chen, since she is governing with a legislative majority and full control over many local governments. A new vision cannot originate from old people in an old political system: There must be change.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Tu Yu-an
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
US President Donald Trump recently repeated his claim that “Taiwan stole America’s chip industry,” reigniting public debate on the issue. As a former Taiwanese minister of economic affairs and an entrepreneur deeply involved in semiconductor supply chain development, I feel a responsibility to clarify this misunderstanding. From the perspective of global industrial evolution and the economic principle of comparative advantage, such a statement appears overly simplistic and risks obscuring the essence of the issue. The rise of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry was not built on “replacing America,” but rather emerged as a result of countries pursuing different development paths within the
RSS