It is bad enough that China is maliciously trying to force Taiwan to “voluntarily” surrender its sovereignty to attend the annual World Health Assembly (WHA), but what is worse is that certain politicians sing along with the only nation that is openly hostile toward Taiwan.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday announced that the long-expected WHA invitation has finally arrived, yet, for the first time in history, UN Resolution 2758 and the “one China” principle are reported to have been specially noted on the invitation. This looks like manipulation by China to force president-elect Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration to recognize the so-called “1992 consensus.”
According to President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), the “1992 consensus” refers to an agreement allegedly reached between China and the KMT government during talks in Singapore in 1992 that both sides would recognize that there is only “one China,” but each could make its own interpretation of what “China” means.
Of course, politics are involved in all international organizations, but it is malicious of China to force Taiwan to bow under political pressure to attend a meeting that is not political.
While it is not surprising that China would make such a move, it is disturbing that KMT politicians — including Presidential Office spokesman Charles Chen (陳以信) and KMT Chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) — welcome such sugar-coated poison and even join Beijing in calling on the incoming administration to accept China’s conditions to attend the meeting.
It is disturbing because, despite the KMT’s and Ma’s claims about the “1992 consensus,” Beijing has insisted that the “consensus” is about recognizing that there is only “one China,” without having ever admitted that each side can have its own interpretation of what that means.
An internal document asks that the WHO refer to Taiwan as “Taiwan, Province of China,” instead of the nation’s official title in the WHA, “Chinese Taipei.”
It is even worse now that UN Resolution 2758, adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1971, has been mentioned.
According to the resolution, after its passage, the UN would recognize that “the representatives of the Government of the People’s Republic of China are the only lawful representatives of China to the UN and that the People’s Republic of China is one of the five permanent members of the Security Council.”
This resolution stripped Taiwan — or the Taipei-based Republic of China regime — of its UN membership.
The original document said that the UN would “expel forthwith the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) from the place which they unlawfully occupy at the UN and in all the organizations related to it.”
By mentioning Resolution 2758, the WHA — and China — is denying Taiwan’s existence — as an independent political entity. It is denying the existence of the “1992 consensus” as the KMT interprets it and it is denying the basis on which Ma claims to have built a more peaceful relationship across the Taiwan Strait.
It does not make sense that the KMT would welcome an invitation that puts Taiwan’s international status below even the KMT’s bottom line, and urge the Democratic Progressive Party to accept it.
The KMT should be the first to protest.
Taiwan aims to elevate its strategic position in supply chains by becoming an artificial intelligence (AI) hub for Nvidia Corp, providing everything from advanced chips and components to servers, in an attempt to edge out its closest rival in the region, South Korea. Taiwan’s importance in the AI ecosystem was clearly reflected in three major announcements Nvidia made during this year’s Computex trade show in Taipei. First, the US company’s number of partners in Taiwan would surge to 122 this year, from 34 last year, according to a slide shown during CEO Jensen Huang’s (黃仁勳) keynote speech on Monday last week.
When China passed its “Anti-Secession” Law in 2005, much of the democratic world saw it as yet another sign of Beijing’s authoritarianism, its contempt for international law and its aggressive posture toward Taiwan. Rightly so — on the surface. However, this move, often dismissed as a uniquely Chinese form of legal intimidation, echoes a legal and historical precedent rooted not in authoritarian tradition, but in US constitutional history. The Chinese “Anti-Secession” Law, a domestic statute threatening the use of force should Taiwan formally declare independence, is widely interpreted as an emblem of the Chinese Communist Party’s disregard for international norms. Critics
Birth, aging, illness and death are inevitable parts of the human experience. Yet, living well does not necessarily mean dying well. For those who have a chronic illness or cancer, or are bedridden due to significant injuries or disabilities, the remainder of life can be a torment for themselves and a hardship for their caregivers. Even if they wish to end their life with dignity, they are not allowed to do so. Bih Liu-ing (畢柳鶯), former superintendent of Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, introduced the practice of Voluntary Stopping of Eating and Drinking as an alternative to assisted dying, which remains
President William Lai (賴清德) has rightly identified the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) as a hostile force; and yet, Taiwan’s response to domestic figures amplifying CCP propaganda remains largely insufficient. The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) recently confirmed that more than 20 Taiwanese entertainers, including high-profile figures such as Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜), are under investigation for reposting comments and images supporting People’s Liberation Army (PLA) drills and parroting Beijing’s unification messaging. If found in contravention of the law, they may be fined between NT$100,000 and NT$500,000. That is not a deterrent. It is a symbolic tax on betrayal — perhaps even a way for
RSS