When talking about the level at which electricity prices should be set, many people, with the public interest in mind, would say that prices should drop. However, perhaps they should look at the German government’s approach.
Electricity prices are higher in Germany than they are in Taiwan and by quite a long way.
However, it is because of the policy of high electricity prices, coupled with the deregulation of the energy industry, and a system allowing private energy provision, that the public has been encouraged to save energy resources and invest in renewable energy. This has meant that many Germans are following a low-carbon lifestyle and some are even earning income by selling the extra electricity they generate from alternative energy sources.
Many German farmers are selling energy to supplement their incomes, while the high electricity prices have also given companies incentives to research and develop energy-efficient products.
German energy-efficient buildings, cars and domestic electrical goods are all giving the nation’s economy a boost. Far from being adversely affected by the high electricity prices, Germany’s economic growth has been stimulated by the green energy industry.
The drop in electricity prices in Taiwan has come about in the face of the international economic situation, the nation’s economic downturn and OPEC’s refusal to reduce oil output.
The government should set up a mechanism to address this kind of unexpected surpluses and use the additional funds brought by them to not cut prices, but to upgrade energy technologies. It should facilitate the achievement of energy development objectives; improve energy security infrastructure; fund research; invest in social education and allocate funds for the compensation of the victims of energy disasters.
If the authorities must reduce energy prices, it should at least be done in a way to achieve certain policy objectives. At a time when the hope is for everyone to move in the direction of reducing energy consumption, encouraging people to use energy by reducing prices would only make it more difficult to achieve that objective.
Furthermore, if this so-called surprise surplus results from a fall in the price of imported energy, that would suggest the reason behind it is something that is beyond the government’s control.
Therefore, if the government is not to use the extra money on other, more constructive objectives, then it should at least use it to mitigate fluctuations in the price of imported energy.
For example, the money could be placed in an imported energy price stabilization fund, which could be used to subsidize power plants when imported energy prices rise to minimize price fluctuations.
The surplus could also be used to encourage energy conservation, giving more refunds to private people and companies that reduce their energy consumption.
The government should also take this opportunity to step up the promotion of energy conservation, green energy provision and reduction in carbon emissions again by offering refunds, allowing the policy to take people in the desired direction.
Taiwan Power’s surplus should reflect environmental costs, as well as the risks of nuclear power, and be used toward speeding up the introduction of a smart grid, rolling out more energy storage capacity and building the infrastructure for the provision of renewable energy.
This is what the government should be doing, rather than reducing electricity prices just to keep the consumer happy.
Kao Ru-ping is chairperson of the Taiwan Renewable Energy Alliance.
Translated by Paul Cooper
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the