After the dismantling of an access ramp to the Zhongxiao Bridge (忠孝橋) on Taipei’s Zhongxiao W Road, the historic North Gate (北門) is once more free of the structural eyesores that surrounded it, a symbol of Taiwan’s apparent newfound respect for culture and historical buildings.
The Taipei Urban Planning Commission, should it choose to, can now continue in this vein when reviewing its urban renewal plans for the western districts of the city by thinking about whether the historic Mitsui-Soko warehouse should be moved 51m east.
Taipei Deputy Mayor Charles Lin (林欽榮) believes that, according to resolutions by the Bureau of Cultural Heritage under the Ministry of Culture from May 2012, this would perhaps be the best way of preserving the building, and has given the plan his blessing.
The primary reason for the swift decision to dismantle the ramp was to relieve traffic congestion around the North Gate.
The second factor had to with cultural, aesthetic and environmental considerations. The speed at which the decision was taken saved countless hours of meetings and veritable mountains of paperwork. In addition to that, it means that the North Gate has been restored as a symbolical gateway into the city.
There is no shortage of similar examples of relocations in other nations. The impressive Abu Simbel temples in Egypt, constructed between 1264 BC and 1244 BC in honor of the pharaoh of the time, Ramses II, comprise an ancient Egyptian historical site originally located about 230km southwest of the present-day city of Aswan, facing the Nile River near Nubia. The complex was set against the mountains and the entrances to the two temples are flanked by massive 20m-tall statues of Ramses II. Beside these statues are a number of much smaller statues, representing members of Ramses II’s family.
At sunrise on Feb. 22 and Aug. 22 of each year, sunlight pours into the entrance of these temples. It is said that the engineers who designed the temples, wanting later generations to remember the pharaoh’s birthday, intentionally and ingeniously applied astronomical calculations to work out a way for the sun’s rays to penetrate the more than 60m-long tunnel, all the way to the end, on the same day every year to illuminate the temple, which had lain untouched by the sun throughout the rest of the year.
Following the Egyptian Revolution of 1952, the Egyptian government decided to construct the Aswan High Dam. Out of concerns that the temples would be permanently submerged, the government set into motion a plan in 1959 to relocate the monuments to a safe location. The result was that the temples were conserved. The only problem is that the sun’s rays hit the chamber a day later than was originally intended.
There are examples of this type of relocation having been performed in Taiwan. The Wang Gong temple in Sihjie (四結), Yilan County, and the Kaohsiung Train Station building were both relocated.
As long as the will is there, there is no reason that the Mitsui-Soko warehouse cannot also become another major symbol of cultural advancement.
Yang Chyi-wen is the president of the Taipei National University of the Arts.
Translated by Paul Cooper
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
RSS