On Tuesday last week, China released the guest list of foreign dignitaries that were to attend yesterday’s military extravaganza.
Most of the heads of state on that list were from former communist countries, many of which are Central Asian nations that gained their statehood after the dissolution of the Soviet Union. China’s face hinges on the number of heads of state that turned out and how much weight they all carry. Domestically, China can exercise fascism, but internationally, diplomacy is needed.
Since the purpose of staging a military parade is to intimidate other nations, leaders of Western democracies boycotted the event; a slap in Beijing’s face.
If the US had approved of Beijing’s saber rattling, China would be invincible. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is already set to visit the US later this month. Would it really be necessary for Xi and US President Barack Obama to meet twice within a month? Despite that, some Chinese media outlets still fueled rumors that Obama would appear at the military parade. After this was confirmed to be false, the Global Times, a tabloid owned by the People’s Daily, the Chinese Communist Party’s official newspaper, ran a disgruntled commentary.
Yesterday’s parade was a public humiliation to Japan. Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe did not attend, although some Japanese media outlets said in July that he might. That was just a tactic to trick other nations into attending, as many Japanese media are pro-China and willing to play the role of a mouthpiece that overlooks China’s vices and speaks highly of its virtues. This is also why young Japanese are opposed to the passage of Japan’s new security bill in the face of Beijing’s threats.
Another person whose attendance was long debated was South Korean President Park Geun-hye. When the Korean War broke out, China invaded South Korea. If the UN force led by the US had not intervened, South Korea would probably not exist today. However, Park could not resist the Chinese lure and she attended the parade despite US opposition. South Korea’s nationalism is a bit strange: There is a stronger anti-Japanese sentiment than in China, but there are also those who have grievances against the US, its protector.
Instead, North Korea was making waves. North Korean leader Kim Jong-un was not invited, apparently because Beijing did not want to embarrass Western countries. After Western leaders turned down their invitations, some thought there was still a chance that Kim would attend, but he apparently had more guts than former vice president Lien Chan (連戰) and not only refused to attend the parade, but managed to capitalize on his decision.
On Aug. 20, North Korean troops fired shells at the South and demanded that Seoul cease its propaganda broadcasts. The next day, Kim announced that North Korea was in a semi-state of war and the rest of the world once again thought he had lost his mind.
In fact, this happened around the time that China was pursuing Park to attend its parade. A scene in which Park and Kim both showed up in Tiananmen Square would have been very weird.
With the Korean Peninsula on the verge of war, Beijing had to intervene to defuse the stand-off. Kim must have been given a lot of concessions to agree to stop the saber-rattling, as the absence of Park in the Chinese extravaganza would have done a lot of harm to China’s political interests.
Will the parade have helped Xi’s Chinese dream come true? It is pretty safe to assume that China’s internal and external crises will not be resolved by conducting a military parade, and it probably only made things worse.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Ethan Zhan
When Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping (習近平) wakes up one morning and decides that his People’s Liberation Army (PLA) can win a war to conquer Taiwan, that is when his war will begin. To ensure that Xi never gains that confidence it is now necessary for the United States to shed any notions of “forbearance” in arms sales to Taiwan. Largely because they could guarantee military superiority on the Taiwan Strait, US administrations from Jimmy Carter to Barack Obama practiced “forbearance” — pre-emptive limitation of arms sales to Taiwan — in hopes of gaining diplomatic leverage with Beijing. President Ronald
As the US marks one month under the leadership of President Joe Biden, the conversations around Taiwan have shifted. As I discussed in a Taipei Times article (“No more talk of ‘bargaining chips,’” Jan. 30, page 8), with the end of former US president Donald Trump’s administration — and all of the unpredictability associated with it — Taiwan would not have to worry about being used as a “bargaining chip” in some sort of deal with the People’s Republic of China. The talk of Taiwan being used as a bargaining chip never subsided over those four years, but under Biden, those
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lin Wei-chou (林為洲) talked about “opposing the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]” in a recent Facebook post, writing that opposing the CCP is not the special reserve of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). Not long after, many people within the KMT received a mysterious letter signed “Chinese Nationalist Party Central Committee” containing what looked like a declaration of opposition to, and a call to arms against, the CCP. Unexpectedly, the KMT’s Culture and Communications Committee came forward with a clarification, saying that the letter was not sent by the KMT and telling the public not to believe
The Canadian parliament on Monday passed a motion saying that China’s human rights abuses against the country’s Uighur Muslim population in Xinjiang constitute “genocide.” Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has so far avoided using the word genocide in regard to Xinjiang, but if he did, it would begin to generate solidarity among G7 nations on the issue — which is something Trudeau has called for. Former US president Donald Trump used the word genocide regarding Xinjiang before leaving office last month, and members of US President Joe Biden’s administration have been pushing for him to make the same declaration, a Reuters report