Saturday marked the 70th anniversary of the end of World War II and celebrations were held around the globe. However, for Taiwanese the war might have ended, but peace never came.
After the end of World War II, Taiwan found itself trapped in the middle of the civil war between the forces of Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Chinese Communist Party (CCP). This was followed by nearly 40 years of martial law and a reign of terror imposed on the Taiwanese by the KMT, which fled to Taiwan from China after losing the civil war.
Taiwan went from being at the forefront of Japan’s military campaign to becoming the battlefield of the civil war between the KMT and the CCP and the front line of the Cold War between the US and the Soviet Union. Even after the Cold War ended in 1991 and the world cheered on as a US-led alliance defeated Saddam Hussein and ended his occupation of Kuwait and then-US president George H.W. Bush declared the establishment of a new world order in the post-Cold War era, Taiwan did not enjoy any peace. The Taiwan Strait was militarized once more as China fired missiles over Taiwan; not because Taiwan had mounted a military operation against China, but because Taiwan was holding a presidential election.
After World War II, several territories established themselves as sovereign countries, such as South Korea, the Philippines, Malaysia, Indonesia, Myanmar and India. However, Taiwan only saw a change of foreign administrations as the Japanese left to make room for the Chinese. Taiwanese fought unyieldingly for democracy against the backdrop of the Chinese civil war and the Cold War. Their endeavors finally bore fruit in the 1990s, but they were immediately vilified by pro-China forces in Taiwan and abroad as populists that changed the so-called “status quo.”
Former adversaries the KMT and CCP found a shared interest in thwarting Taiwan’s pursuit of democracy and self-determination, and began to cooperate, setting off a political civil war over Taiwan’s democracy. The oppression of foreign powers and foreign regimes left Taiwan with sovereignty problems internationally and conflict between the pro-unification and pro-independence ideologies domestically. Seventy years after the war ended, peace is still nowhere to be seen.
Taiwan has always been beset by foreign powers, forbidding Taiwan even from saying what it is or what it is not, and there are even attempts to force Taiwan to accept a peace treaty at the expense of its dignity and freedom. Looking back at the past 70 years, where the nation has seen the end of a war without the ensuing peace, Taiwanese have discovered that what Taiwan needs above all is a just peace.
As Martin Luther King Jr rightly put it, “Peace is not the absence of conflict, but the presence of justice.”
In view of the ongoing international and domestic conflicts that have enveloped Taiwan, it is evident that the nation is still shrouded in the shadow of World War II. Rediscovering Taiwan’s World War II history and establishing Taiwan’s own historic perspective on World War II are key to a peaceful Taiwan.
On Saturday, commemorations were held by several civic groups in Taipei, Taoyuan and Kaohsiung, as well as Changhua to mark the 70th anniversary of the end of World War II, which shows the importance Taiwanese society gives to this event.
History beckons Taiwanese to ponder what actions are required to help the tormented souls of their forefathers to finally rest in peace and establish a real peace for future generations.
Lai I-chung is an executive committee member of the Taiwan Thinktank.
Translated by Ethan Zhan
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
RSS