Saturday marked the 70th anniversary of the end of World War II and celebrations were held around the globe. However, for Taiwanese the war might have ended, but peace never came.
After the end of World War II, Taiwan found itself trapped in the middle of the civil war between the forces of Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Chinese Communist Party (CCP). This was followed by nearly 40 years of martial law and a reign of terror imposed on the Taiwanese by the KMT, which fled to Taiwan from China after losing the civil war.
Taiwan went from being at the forefront of Japan’s military campaign to becoming the battlefield of the civil war between the KMT and the CCP and the front line of the Cold War between the US and the Soviet Union. Even after the Cold War ended in 1991 and the world cheered on as a US-led alliance defeated Saddam Hussein and ended his occupation of Kuwait and then-US president George H.W. Bush declared the establishment of a new world order in the post-Cold War era, Taiwan did not enjoy any peace. The Taiwan Strait was militarized once more as China fired missiles over Taiwan; not because Taiwan had mounted a military operation against China, but because Taiwan was holding a presidential election.
After World War II, several territories established themselves as sovereign countries, such as South Korea, the Philippines, Malaysia, Indonesia, Myanmar and India. However, Taiwan only saw a change of foreign administrations as the Japanese left to make room for the Chinese. Taiwanese fought unyieldingly for democracy against the backdrop of the Chinese civil war and the Cold War. Their endeavors finally bore fruit in the 1990s, but they were immediately vilified by pro-China forces in Taiwan and abroad as populists that changed the so-called “status quo.”
Former adversaries the KMT and CCP found a shared interest in thwarting Taiwan’s pursuit of democracy and self-determination, and began to cooperate, setting off a political civil war over Taiwan’s democracy. The oppression of foreign powers and foreign regimes left Taiwan with sovereignty problems internationally and conflict between the pro-unification and pro-independence ideologies domestically. Seventy years after the war ended, peace is still nowhere to be seen.
Taiwan has always been beset by foreign powers, forbidding Taiwan even from saying what it is or what it is not, and there are even attempts to force Taiwan to accept a peace treaty at the expense of its dignity and freedom. Looking back at the past 70 years, where the nation has seen the end of a war without the ensuing peace, Taiwanese have discovered that what Taiwan needs above all is a just peace.
As Martin Luther King Jr rightly put it, “Peace is not the absence of conflict, but the presence of justice.”
In view of the ongoing international and domestic conflicts that have enveloped Taiwan, it is evident that the nation is still shrouded in the shadow of World War II. Rediscovering Taiwan’s World War II history and establishing Taiwan’s own historic perspective on World War II are key to a peaceful Taiwan.
On Saturday, commemorations were held by several civic groups in Taipei, Taoyuan and Kaohsiung, as well as Changhua to mark the 70th anniversary of the end of World War II, which shows the importance Taiwanese society gives to this event.
History beckons Taiwanese to ponder what actions are required to help the tormented souls of their forefathers to finally rest in peace and establish a real peace for future generations.
Lai I-chung is an executive committee member of the Taiwan Thinktank.
Translated by Ethan Zhan
With a new White House document in May — the “Strategic Approach to the People’s Republic of China” — the administration of US President Donald Trump has firmly set its hyper-competitive line to tackle geoeconomic and geostrategic rivalry, followed by several reinforcing speeches by Trump and other Cabinet-level officials. By identifying China as a near-equal rival, the strategy resonates well with the bipartisan consensus on China in today’s severely divided US. In the face of China’s rapidly growing aggression, the move is long overdue, yet relevant for the maintenance of the international “status quo.” The strategy seems to herald a new
To say that this year has been eventful for China and the rest of the world would be something of an understatement. First, the US-China trade dispute, already simmering for two years, reached a boiling point as Washington tightened the noose around China’s economy. Second, China unleashed the COVID-19 pandemic on the world, wreaking havoc on an unimaginable scale and turning the People’s Republic of China into a common target of international scorn. Faced with a mounting crisis at home, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) rashly decided to ratchet up military tensions with neighboring countries in a misguided attempt to divert the
Toward the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) final term in office, there was much talk about his legacy. Ma himself would likely prefer history books to enshrine his achievements in reducing cross-strait tensions. He might see his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Singapore in 2015 as the high point. However, given his statements in the past few months, he might be remembered more for contributing to the breakup of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). We are still talking about Ma and his legacy because it is inextricably tied to the so-called “1992 consensus” as the bedrock of his
Retired army major general Yu Pei-chen (于北辰), a former head the Taoyuan chapter of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) veterans branch, on Wednesday last week said that chapter head Tsang You-hsia (臧幼俠) — who dismissed Yu from his position — “would rather see cross-strait unification than yield to the Democratic Progressive Party [DPP] government.” The statement ignited public debate, as it was the first time that a retired officer loyal to the nation — and the KMT — said out loud what has long been rumored among the public: Some KMT members would rather work with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)