As Taiwan’s economy relies heavily on exports, it should be vigilant against a possible domino effect caused by the escalating Greek debt crisis, as crumbling talks with its European creditors over the weekend pushed Greece to the brink of bankruptcy, which could have substantial repercussions.
Greece was expected to default on a 1.6 billion euro loan repayment to the IMF yesterday, with international creditors refusing yet another loan extension due to a lack of substantial economic reform measures.
Greece on Monday announced the closure of banks for one week and imposed capital controls after Greek bank deposits fell to an 11-year low. Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras’ announcement that its European lenders’ fresh bailout measures would be put before voters in a referendum brings the nation one step closer to exiting the euro.
Taiwanese markets suffered from the intensifying Greek debt crisis as the latest developments left investors fretting that a Greek exit from the euro would destabilize economic recovery in the eurozone and even affect the global economy.
The TAIEX took a nosedive on Monday to 9,236.1, below the monthly average of 9,300, as investors scrambled to sell equities. Foreign investors sold a net total of NT$7.1 billion (US$228.52 million) of local shares on Monday. Among Asian markets, which were the first to trade in the wake of the weekend’s developments in Greece, the Nikkei 225 stock average in Tokyo plunged 2.9 percent, while the Shanghai Composite Index tumbled 3.3 percent and Hong Kong’s Hang Seng sank 2.6 percent.
As the Greek drama played out, the Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&P dipped 1.95 percent and 2.09 percent overnight respectively, while the FTSE 100 in London fell 1.97 percent and the DAX in Frankfurt, Germany, plunged 3.56 percent.
For Taiwan, the Greek debt crisis might seem somewhat irrelevant given that as of April, the nation’s 37 lenders’ combined exposure to Greece totaled NT$35 million, and local insurance companies and fund brokerages do not hold any position in Greek securities, according to the Financial Supervisory Commission.
Despite the TAIEX yesterday bouncing back 0.94 percent, Taiwan should be wary, as the repercussions of the Greek debt crisis are likely to result in a weakened euro and have an impact on single-currency economies, translating into slower consumer spending and less private investment. Such a scenario would result in weakened demand for electronics. As Europe is one of the major overseas markets for Taiwan’s machine tool suppliers and electronics brands, such as Acer Inc, Asustek Computer Inc and HTC Corp, a faltering European economy and a decline in private consumption would impact negatively on local exports.
Europe is the fourth-largest export destination for Taiwanese manufacturers, accounting for 8.8 percent of exports in the first five months of this year, according to the latest statistics released by the Ministry of Finance. Exports to Europe contracted at an annual rate of 12 percent to US$10.49 billion in the first quarter, while total exports fell 5.7 percent year-on-year, marking the sixth consecutive month of annual decline, ministry data showed. Electronic products were the biggest export item, accounting for nearly 33 percent during the same period.
The statistics did not include goods exported to China and then re-exported to Europe. Including re-exported goods, Europe was the second-largest market, after China, accounting for 18 percent of Taiwan’s exports, surpassing ASEAN and the US, which accounted for 18 percent and 12 percent respectively.
Due to the effects of globalization, adverse economic conditions can affect the global economy. As Taiwan is a small economy, vulnerable to market volatility, it must prepare for major economic changes.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS