When policymakers turn to economists for guidance, they expect the advice they receive to be grounded in science, not academic factionalism or political presuppositions. After all, the policies they will be putting in place will have real implications for real people. Unfortunately, however, sound science is not always the driving force behind economic analysis and policy recommendations.
In a recent critique of what he calls the “mathiness” of modern economics, Paul Romer of New York University said that economists should take measures to exclude academic factionalism and politics from the “dismal science.” Romer grounds his case in an ongoing debate in his field about the role that ideas play in promoting economic growth.
Romer seems to be worried principally about some economists’ tendency to claim that what is true about certain types of theories is true of all theories and thus applicable to the real world. As an example of this tendency, Romer cites the work of University of Chicago economist Robert Lucas, who, in his 2009 paper Ideas and Growth, dismisses the role that books or blueprints can play in driving growth.
“Some knowledge can be ‘embodied’ in books, blueprints, machines and other kinds of physical capital, and we know how to introduce capital into a growth model, but we also know that doing so does not by itself provide an engine of sustained growth,” Lucas wrote.
The problem is that Lucas’ statement is true only for models of economic growth that are specified in such a way that the return on “embodied” capital drops to zero as capital accumulates.
As Romer acknowledges, there are many models for which this is simply not true.
What Lucas makes out to be a general truth — that the path to economic growth cannot lie in creating and acquiring the kind of knowledge that is “embodied” in books, blueprints and machines — rests on a barely examined decision to restrict attention to just a few kinds of models.
Lucas’ decision might be somewhat justifiable if the models he chose were the only ones that were correct. However, of course that is not the case.
In addition to criticizing those that draw general conclusions from specific cases, Romer takes aim at those who claim that economic models permit only one mode of interaction and only one mode of individual decisionmaking.
Romer’s principle objection is to the assumption that the only interaction allowable in economic growth models is what is known as “price-taking,” the buying or selling of goods and services at the price currently offered by the market.
I would add to that my objection to the assumption that individual decisionmaking is always characterized by rational expectations.
Assumptions like these might be adequate as foundations on which to build models to help us understand the world, but only if market processes were structured exactly right, smoothing out at the aggregate level all the deviations from price-taking and rational expectations that are clearly evident at the individual level. Asking whether, which and when market processes meet such criteria is an empirical question. Claiming that all market processes must be so structured is theoretical malfeasance.
And it is widespread. In the field of growth theory, Romer sees the current generation of neoclassical economists grind out paper after paper imposing the theoretical restrictions necessary for a price-taking equilibrium. As he correctly says, such papers are useless for any purpose other than advancing their authors’ positions in academic status games.
Meanwhile, in macroeconomics, economists, bankers, industrialists, technocrats and politicians make the claim that the policies governments could implement to speed an economic recovery must be, if not counterproductive, at least too risky. After all, that is what a model with a very restricted class of rational expectations would predict.
At the same time, stakeholders must recognize that the problem Romer pinpoints is not a new one. Just the other day, I came across critiques of expansionary fiscal and monetary policy made by Canadian economist Jacob Viner and French economist Etienne Mantoux. They both argued in the 1930s — in the middle of the Great Depression, no less — that government efforts to boost employment would always result in undesirable and unwarranted inflation, and would probably reduce output in the long run.
What is most depressing about Romer’s argument is how unlikely it is to be heeded. Romer might be able to convince academic economists to be more cautious about making claims concerning the generality of theories of economic growth. However, it is less than clear that bankers, industrialists, technocrats and politicians — who are responsible for the policies that impact people’s lives — will do the same.
J. Bradford DeLong is a professor of economics at the University of California at Berkeley and a research associate at the US’ National Bureau of Economic Research.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused