A month ago, Hong Kong residents launched the Occupy Central movement in their quest for universal suffrage in the 2017 elections. Although there has been dialogue between the territory’s government and student representatives, agreement has been elusive and it almost seems as if the civil protest movement and the occupation of Hong Kong’s streets could become permanent.
It thus seems as if this tug-of-war between those who support universal values and the government’s “election system with Chinese characteristics” will continue for a long time, and no one can predict the outcome.
At the broadcast public dialogue which took place on Tuesday last week, five representatives of the student alliance declared that Hong Kongers have a legitimate right to elect their chief executive in free elections.
Representatives of the Hong Kong government had no choice but to repeat the resolution adopted by China’s National People’s Congress’ Standing Committee, unable to overturn it. Their statements were neither reasonable nor forceful, and could not convince the people.
Since they could not even convince people that their stance was reasonable, the Hong Kong government is now forced to resort to a strategy of procrastination in the hope that the Occupy Central movement will die out of itself, while the government relies on the police force to remove protesters and even makes use of organized crime and groups opposed to the Occupy Central movement to incite violent clashes.
The government has also put pressure on media outlets supporting the Occupy Central movement, doing all it can to undermine the movement and force through Beijing’s uncompromising instructions.
However, a survey by the Chinese University of Hong Kong shows that support for the movement is growing steadily, and that among respondents between the ages of 15 and 25, a mere 7.7 percent were opposed to the movement. This implies that the young generation of Hong Kongers have internalized the demand for universal suffrage and the implementation of democracy, making it their highest value.
The significance of the ongoing civil movement is that it has initiated a generational shift in Hong Kong, and if the governments in Beijing and Hong Kong continue to do as they wish while ignoring other opinions, there will be more occupations and protests than they can handle.
In short, the policymakers in Beijing not only underestimated the will and determination of Hong Kong’s civil society to push for universal suffrage in the chief executive election, they also failed to see that so many people would be brave enough to take to the streets in protest and fearlessly engage in trench warfare and guerrilla warfare with the much better-equipped police force.
Most important of all, Beijing’s outrageous attitude has disappointed the public, and the collapse of Hong Kong governance is becoming more obvious every day as a crack in the centralized Chinese government’s armor appears.
Who knows? Maybe Hong Kong’s struggle for democracy will set off a butterfly effect and result in a new democratization movement. Perhaps the fourth wave of democracy is about to be unleashed.
Ku Chung-hwa is director of the New School for Democracy.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China