Unlikely and strange as it may seem, serious changes continue in the alleged “Middle Kingdom,” China. They are conflicting changes whose directions may not necessarily be for the better. Some will champion these changes, while others will try to contest them or spin them into minimalism. Few could have anticipated them, especially with all of their ramifications, but when examined more deeply, they remain changes that will draw future battle lines and despite wishful promises, they will shatter both the dreams and illusions of many.
Start with the latest revealing confluence of events. The first big exposure came with Erwan Rambourg’s new book, The Bling Dynasty: Why the Reign of Chinese Luxury Shoppers Has Only Just Begun, published in August. This book has a challenging and provocative title, and the author, HSBC’s managing director and co-head of the bank’s global consumer and retail equity research, is well qualified to talk on the subject, ie, marketing, and in particular China’s “increasing and volatile demand for luxury items.” That is his topic, but the “dynasty” that lay behind his talk is the real change and revelation.
Converging with this publication is a contrasting event with different exposure and consequences, namely that of power and control versus promises and hope. This event began in Hong Kong a month after the book was published. The protests in Hong Kong reflect changes in a totally different arena — the political arena — and they focus on a different fact, namely that Beijing promised Hong Kongers the right to elect their leaders 20 years after the 1997 handover. Now, however, 17 years later, Beijing is reneging on that promise and granting the people of Hong Kong the right to choose between only two or three candidates vetted by Beijing. In its continued controlling style, Beijing claims that Hong Kong obviously did not read the fine print in its promise.
What is the backdrop? Step back about 100 years to the year 1911. At that time, Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙) had a stillborn dream for a democratic and republican China, with a proposed government of the people, by the people and for the people. Sun’s revolutionary dream took down the Qing Dynasty, but it did not create the republic that Sun wished. Sun’s dream got sidetracked by Yuan Shi-kai (袁世凱), warlords and eventually the Civil War between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
The fall of the Qing Empire instead echoed the opening line of the Romance of the Three Kingdoms: “The empire long divided must unite, long united must divide. Thus it has ever been.” The Manchu Qing had created and united a more expansive empire than the Han Ming ever had, but that Manchu empire long united did eventually divide and it remained thus divided until the CCP eventually united it (without Mongolia) in 1949.
However, the key point, beyond division or unity, is that the CCP in no way has followed the dream of Sun. Instead it created another empire, its own empire with a new privileged class — moneyed. After Mao’s cultural and economic disasters, this new empire was rescued by Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), who embraced a pragmatic capitalism, figuring that whether the system is black or white, economic results were of central importance. Rambourg whimsically or cleverly has aptly termed this new empire “the Bling Empire.” The name not only rhymes with Ming and Qing, but also seriously reflects the new true determinant of a twisted Confucian hierarchy in the empire — the buying power of merchants.
Those who follow wealth would know that China under Dengism increased enormously in wealth. As of this year, China became second only to the US in both the number of billionaires and the number of millionaires that it has. This is a strange and unusual statistic for a country that proposes to be communist, or at least socialist.
Ironically in this new empire, the way to advancement has also changed. One no longer needs to pass any type of imperial exams; one has to be either a descendant of the ruling families of the Central Committee or one needs the right connections and drive to accumulate wealth and buying power. And there is more.
That China is the most populous country in the world is common knowledge, but few grasp what that actually translates into. China has an estimated population of 1.357 billion people, a figure nearly four times that of the US’ 316 million. China has about 2.38 million millionaires. However, even if China increased its number of millionaires a hundred-fold, it would still have about 1 billion poor who live in the urban/rural divide. While a privileged few roam the world, the one-party state oligarchy prevents both urban migration with strict imperial control of the household registration system (hokou) and international travel with extremely limited visas as well.
If these could be seen simply as statistics, there would be little problem, but what Rambourg brings out is that these statistics reflect more. Only 4 percent can travel and the few are becoming the major consumers of luxury items worldwide and account for 35 percent of luxury sales. It may be 50 percent by 2025. Those in the 4 percent are the drivers of the luxury consumption market. Rambourg ponders what would their buying power be if 8 percent were allowed to travel.
Rambourg is on the lecture circuit with this; he will be in Taiwan next month. While brand name companies are no doubt licking their chops at these predictions of consumerism, they are also trying to figure out the shifting consumption taste of these new buyers. Wealth is glorious, so how can brand names get their piece of the pie?
As the business world salivates over its new challenge, take a look at what Hong Kong’s protests have exposed. Hong Kong (where Rambourg lives) has already experienced this new wealthy class firsthand and ironically calls them “locusts.” Hong Kong has also experienced firsthand the one party-state control of this new dynasty and sees it for what it is, a century after Sun’s dream. In 17 years, the simple promise of popular suffrage remains unachievable even for the special administrative region that has the “privilege of one country and two systems.”
One thinks of the misinterpreted and misapplied quote of Zhou Enlai (周恩來) when asked about the impact of revolutionary happenings in France. Thinking of the late 1960s, he said: “It is still too early to tell.”
Switch and ask has Sun’s 1911 dream of a democratic republic for China had any impact? The facetious answer comes: “A century later, it is still too early to tell.”
The reasons that attempts to root out China’s inherent corruption will fail is material for another piece. Rambourg still predicts that the wealth of the few in China is here to stay, so what will the new empire do as the economic engine begins to slow down? The oligarchs that rule from Beijing will not sacrifice money and power. And pipedream pundits who still try to say that democracy will come to China had best seek a new answer.
Taiwanese, initially drawn like moths to the fires of this new wealth, are finally starting to realize how this new and unrelenting dynasty threatens their democracy. And what of Sun’s dream for China? It is gone with the winds of change in the Bling Empire. What will come in its place is still too early to tell, but it will not be democracy.
Jerome Keating is a commentator in Taipei.
The bird flu outbreak at US dairy farms keeps finding alarming new ways to surprise scientists. Last week, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) confirmed that H5N1 is spreading not just from birds to herds, but among cows. Meanwhile, media reports say that an unknown number of cows are asymptomatic. Although the risk to humans is still low, it is clear that far more work needs to be done to get a handle on the reach of the virus and how it is being transmitted. That would require the USDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to get
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
On April 11, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida delivered a speech at a joint meeting of the US Congress in Washington, in which he said that “China’s current external stance and military actions present an unprecedented and the greatest strategic challenge … to the peace and stability of the international community.” Kishida emphasized Japan’s role as “the US’ closest ally.” “The international order that the US worked for generations to build is facing new challenges,” Kishida said. “I understand it is a heavy burden to carry such hopes on your shoulders,” he said. “Japan is already standing shoulder to shoulder
Former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) used to push for reforms to protect Taiwan by adopting the “three noes” policy as well as “Taiwanization.” Later, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) wished to save the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) by pushing for the party’s “localization,” hoping to compete with homegrown political parties as a pro-Taiwan KMT. However, the present-day members of the KMT do not know what they are talking about, and do not heed the two former presidents’ words, so the party has suffered a third consecutive defeat in the January presidential election. Soon after gaining power with the help of the KMT’s