As Hong Kongers hold the largest-scale protests seen since the handover to China in 1997, demanding that Beijing allow full and open elections for Hong Kong’s chief executive, Taiwanese have been asking themselves whether they are also prepared to stand up to China when the nation’s democracy is in danger.
No one can say without a shadow of a doubt that the answer is yes.
The student-led Sunflower movement in March and April called for a legally binding mechanism to oversee cross-strait negotiations. This implies that there is a growing awareness among the public of what the President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) administration’s conduct of cross-strait relations based on the Hong Kong model entails. Nevertheless, it seems what many fear, that “Hong Kong’s present could be Taiwan’s future,” is still an inconceivable outcome for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
In an apparent move to mitigate the negative effects on Taiwanese of China’s failure to honor the promises made to Hong Kong in the “one country, two systems” framework — a new testament of intolerance of democracy in China’s territory — the Ma administration has been trying to sway public opinion toward its arguments that Taiwan’s situation is entirely unrelated to that of Hong Kong.
Two main points have been raised in recent statements by Ma, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), and a spate of op-eds published by the state-owned Central News Agency (CNA).
First, they said that the Republic of China (ROC) has been an independent, sovereign nation with a long history of elections, unlike Hong Kong, which is officially back under China’s control.
Second, the ROC did not acquiesce to the “one country, two systems” policy and would never accept the arrangement enforced on Hong Kong.
The world has continued to urge Beijing to act as a responsible global stakeholder and abide by the Sino-British Joint Declaration and the Basic Law of Hong Kong, and more importantly, to embrace international norms and grant genuine democratic reform to the territory.
However, the arguments coming from the Ma administration have been heading in the opposite direction.
There has not been condemnation of Beijing from the government over its repression of the democratic rights Hong Kongers have long fought for. The government has offered little but generalities whenever it has addressed the issue.
As the Ma administration continues its attempt to convince the public that Taiwan cannot suffer the same fate as that plaguing Hong Kong, and the public sees the way Beijing is handling the ongoing protests in Hong Kong, anti-China sentiment in Taiwan is likely to be inflamed. There is a clear attempt to mitigate this on the part of the Ma administration.
Even though there are differences between Taiwan and Hong Kong, as pointed out by the Ma administration, it does not mean that Taiwan is more capable of determining its own future than Hong Kong is.
Beijing has managed to cement its influence on Taiwan by using its economic clout since the 2010 signing of the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, just as it has tightened its grip on Hong Kong since the 2003 signing of the Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement.
It is Taiwan’s increasing economic dependency on China that is making it increasingly susceptible to Chinese influence and as vulnerable as Hong Kong is.
Taiwan faces another challenge — the cross-strait relationship is generally regarded as an issue between Taiwan and China, whereas the world is watching Hong Kong. The reasons for this are worth considering, but the key is that how Taiwan reacts to Hong Kong protests are important not only to Hong Kong, but also to its own future.
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
A report by the US-based Jamestown Foundation on Tuesday last week warned that China is operating illegal oil drilling inside Taiwan’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the Taiwan-controlled Pratas Island (Dongsha, 東沙群島), marking a sharp escalation in Beijing’s “gray zone” tactics. The report said that, starting in July, state-owned China National Offshore Oil Corp installed 12 permanent or semi-permanent oil rig structures and dozens of associated ships deep inside Taiwan’s EEZ about 48km from the restricted waters of Pratas Island in the northeast of the South China Sea, islands that are home to a Taiwanese garrison. The rigs not only typify
Reading Lee Min-yung’s (李敏勇) article (“Taiwanese must unite to protect our nation,” Aug. 16, page 8) about Taiwan’s unfinished nationhood struck a chord with me. His reminder that Taiwan must raise its own banner of identity reminded me of my story as a Hong Konger born in the 1960s who lived through the loss of that very freedom. Hong Kong was ceded to the UK in 1842 and remained under British rule for 155 years. It grew from a fishing port into an international financial center — once dubbed the “Pearl of the Orient.” These achievements had nothing to do with
RSS