Taiwanese time and again have demonstrated their empathy with and concern for victims of disasters at home and abroad through generous financial donations.
The deadly explosions in Greater Kaohsiung on July 31 and Aug. 1 that killed 30 and injured more than 300 are no different: Offers of assistance and financial donations instantly poured in from all corners of the nation, with civic organizations and charity groups quickly mobilizing resources and members to help people affected by the disaster.
The Bank of Kaohsiung Municipal Treasury Department’s disaster relief account — number 102103031319 — set up by Greater Kaohsiung’s Social Affairs Bureau has received more than NT$3.04 billion (US$101.4 million) as of Wednesday, the city said.
However, while Taiwanese have reached out to affected people through charity work and donations, many have found the acts of the Red Cross Society of the Republic of China (ROC) rather disturbing.
Last week, a number of local television stations collaborated to host fundraising events where celebrities and athletes came together in two call-in TV fundraisers. In both cases, the television stations also teamed up with the Red Cross Society of the ROC, through which the money collected was to be forwarded to the account set up by Kaohsiung’s Social Affairs Bureau.
However, the move raised eyebrows, with many questioning the need to have the funds go through the Red Cross Society when people could easily donate directly to the account.
The public has valid cause for concern. The semi-governmental organization recently admitted that it deducts 2 to 15 percent of donations it collects for administrative expenses. In other words, the NT$100 that someone donates to the group for disaster relief could wind up being just NT$85 that reaches the needy.
Further, the organization has a poor track record of transferring public pledges to the intended recipients in a timely fashion.
After Japan’s devastating earthquake and tsunami on March 11, 2011, the organization received NT$1.87 billion in donations by April 7 that year from Taiwanese for relief work in Japan. However, by mid-April 2011, it had disbursed just NT$450 million to Japan, saying it was to send donations in stages to disaster areas pending more information on the Japanese government’s post-disaster plans. The move upset many in Taiwan, with thousands taking their anger to Facebook, petitioning the organization to immediately transfer the full amount to its Japanese counterpart.
In May 2012, media outlets also reported that following the South Asian tsunami in 2004, the earthquake in China’s Sichuan Province in 2008, Typhoon Morakot in Taiwan in 2009 as well as the earthquake disaster in Japan in 2011, the organization received about NT$10 billion in pledges, but still had about NT$4.3 billion yet to disburse to the intended recipients.
Although the group later clarified its actions, they nevertheless left a negative image.
While its name may suggest a link with the International Committee of the Red Cross or the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, the Red Cross Society of the ROC has no relation to either, meaning its conduct and operations are not monitored by the two international organizations.
In fact, the Red Cross Society of the ROC is not required to publicize details of the donations it receives, nor does it need to abide by the Charity Donations Act (公益勸募條例).
Given this lack of transparency, the Red Cross Society Act of the Republic of China must be amended to make the collection and disbursement of donations — as well as how it manages its administrative fees — more transparent.
After all, every donation, big or small, comes with love from people in Taiwan. Every cent donated must rapidly be put to its intended use for post-disaster work and not be abused by an organization suspected of operating in a dubious manner.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS