The latest US-Africa Leaders Summit in Washington was of great importance because it signaled the determination of US President Barack Obama’s administration to re-engage the continent after a decade of antiterrorism efforts focused on Central Asia and the Middle East.
As the US considers China to be a strategic competitor in geopolitics, it sets out to propagate the Euro-American ideas of democratization and technology-driven economic development.
Over the past two decades, many leaders in Africa have been drawn to China’s principles of non-intervention and development through labor.
First, China’s century-long experience of anti-imperialist struggle and nation-building, wherein the country started its modernization from a position inferior to that of the West and Meiji Japan, attests to its successful modernization as an only recent phenomenon.
Hence, African states can model themselves on Chinese labor-intensive economic development, with the painful process of governance change a positive result of, not a wishful precondition for, development.
Second, with Chinese contributions to technology transfer, including not only upgrades of infrastructure projects previously funded by Mao Zedong (毛澤東) but also recently the creation of development zones and agro-technical centers, African nations can generate employment opportunities and improve their formal economic sectors.
For example, the China-Africa Development Fund, with a budget of US$5 billion, is designed to finance joint ventures.
In contrast with the West’s continual emphasis on democratization, poverty reduction and individual empowerment, China’s macro-level development approach has been hailed as a successful model of rapid economic growth and relative political stability because it puts collective interests ahead of any hasty impulse to liberalize the country.
Several years ago, US diplomatic cables revealed by WikiLeaks indicated heavy pressure from China to poach the remaining allies of Taiwan.
China’s economic clout and international prestige presented an irresistible attraction to Taiwan’s few allies in Africa and Latin America.
From 2005 to last year, African countries such as Senegal, Chad, Malawi and the Gambia severed diplomatic ties with Taiwan and established normal relations with China.
China handed out huge amounts of financial assistance that Taiwan simply could not match.
By 2012, bilateral trade between China and Malawi had reached US$297 million, between Senegal and China it was US$845 million and between China and Costa Rica it totaled US$6.17 billion.
However, with a vast array of possible allies in Africa all is not lost for Taiwan.
The recent US pivot toward Africa presents Taiwan an opportunity to position itself as a model of democratic transformation and technology-driven modernization for the developing world and gives the nation the autonomy to reset its international agenda.
There is no doubt, given the results of China’s relentless actions, and the recent US movements to re-engage, that Africa offers great opportunities for Taiwan to boost its growing economy through investment.
It is now time for Taiwan to expand economic aid and cultural exchange programs on the African continent and forge new alliances against a rising China.
Joseph Lee is professor of history and co-director of Global Asia studies program at Pace University in New York.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS