We may now have a new “most unread bestseller of all time,” as data from Amazon Kindles suggests that that honor may go to Thomas Piketty’s Capital in the Twenty-First Century, which reached No. 1 on the best-seller list this year.
Jordan Ellenberg, a professor of mathematics at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, wrote in the Wall Street Journal that Piketty’s book seems to eclipse its rivals in losing readers: All five of the passages that readers on Kindle have highlighted most are in the first 26 pages of a tome that runs for 685 pages.
The rush to purchase Piketty’s book suggested that Americans must have wanted to understand inequality. The apparent rush to put it down suggests that, well, we are human.
So let me satisfy this demand with my own “Idiot’s Guide to Inequality.” Here are five points:
First, economic inequality has worsened significantly in the US and some other countries. The richest 1 percent in the US now own more wealth than the bottom 90 percent. Oxfam estimates that the richest 85 people in the world own half of all wealth.
The situation might be tolerable if a rising tide were lifting all boats, but it is lifting mostly the yachts. In 2010, 93 percent of the additional income created in the US went to the top 1 percent.
Second, inequality in the US is destabilizing. Some inequality is essential to create incentives, but we seem to have reached the point where inequality actually becomes an impediment to economic growth.
Certainly, the nation grew more quickly in periods when we were more equal, including in the golden decades after World War II when growth was strong and inequality actually diminished. Likewise, a major research paper from the IMF in April found that more equitable societies tend to enjoy more rapid economic growth.
Even Goldman Sachs chief executive Lloyd Blankfein warns that “too much ... has gone to too few” and that inequality in the US is now “very destabilizing.”
Inequality causes problems by creating fissures in societies, leaving those at the bottom feeling marginalized or disenfranchised. That has been a classic problem in “banana republic” countries in Latin America, and the US now has a Gini coefficient — a standard measure of inequality — approaching some traditionally poor and dysfunctional South American countries.
Third, disparities reflect not just the invisible hand of the market, but also manipulation of markets. Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz wrote a terrific book two years ago, The Price of Inequality, which is a shorter and easier read than Piketty’s.
In it, he writes: “Much of America’s inequality is the result of market distortions, with incentives directed not at creating new wealth, but at taking it from others.”
For example, financiers are wealthy partly because they are highly educated and hardworking — and also because they have successfully lobbied for the carried interest tax loophole that lets their pay be taxed at much lower rates than other people’s.
Likewise, if you are a pharmaceutical executive, one way to create profits is to generate new products. Another is to lobby the US Congress to bar the government’s Medicare program from bargaining for drug prices. That amounts to a US$50 billion annual gift to pharmaceutical companies.
Fourth, inequality does not necessarily benefit even the rich as much as we think. At some point, extra incomes do not go to sate desires, but to attempt to buy status through “positional goods,” like the hottest car on the block.
The problem is that there can only be one hottest car on the block. So the lawyer who buys a Porsche is foiled by the chief executive who buys a Ferrari, who in turn is foiled by the hedge fund manager who buys a Lamborghini. This arms race leaves these desires unsated; there is still only one at the top of the heap.
Fifth, progressives probably talk too much about “inequality” and not enough about “opportunity.” Some voters are turned off by tirades about inequality because they say it connotes envy of the rich; there is more consensus on bringing everyone to the same starting line.
Unfortunately, equal opportunity is now a mirage. Researchers find that there is less economic mobility in the US than in class-conscious Europe.
We know some of the tools, including job incentives and better schools, that can reduce this opportunity gap. Yet the US is one of the few advanced countries that spends less educating the average poor child than the average rich one. As an escalator of mobility, the US’ education system is broken.
There’s still a great deal we do not understand about inequality, but regardless of whether you read Piketty, there is one overwhelming lesson you should be aware of: Inequality and lack of opportunity today constitute a national infirmity and vulnerability — and there are policy tools that can make a difference.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the