When Takeshi Ishida was drafted into the Japanese military in 1943, he believed he was fighting a just war to liberate Asia from Western colonialism. It was only after taking part in daily exercises in which he was trained to kill that Ishida began to question Japanese militarism.
When the full horror of Japan’s wartime atrocities became apparent in the aftermath of its surrender, Ishida devoted himself to defending the pacifist constitution imposed on the country by victorious US occupation authorities.
Now, the former Imperial Japanese Army officer is consumed with fear that young Japanese will again be sent to fight overseas, following the most dramatic shift in the country’s defense policy for almost 70 years.
On Tuesday, conservative Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and his Cabinet agreed to lift the longstanding ban on Japan’s troops engaging in combat overseas, a move Ishida believes could once again drag his country into a reckless war.
“What Abe is doing is destroying the principles of our pacifist constitution,” Ishida, a professor emeritus at Tokyo University, told The Guardian. “Not killing anyone abroad is, in a sense, a precious part of our heritage. Why should we have to throw it away on the orders of one man rather than through the will of the people?”
Ishida, 91, believes that Japan’s US-authored constitution is at the heart of its postwar peace.
“I came to realize that I had been indoctrinated to become a militaristic youth,” he said. “As someone who felt for a while that he had lost his identity, the peace constitution was a great encouragement.”
That tradition of pacifism is in danger of being abandoned as Abe moves to reinterpret the constitution and lift the self-imposed ban on collective defense, or coming to the aid of an ally under attack.
Japan will not attempt to revise its constitution outright — an option Abe apparently abandoned after accepting that he would not win the necessary majorities in parliament and in a nationwide referendum — but will reinterpret the “pacifist” Article 9, which prohibits the threat or use of force as a means of settling international disputes.
The change, which is expected to be approved by parliament — where Abe’s Liberal Democratic Party and its junior coalition partner hold majorities — would allow Tokyo to exercise collective self-defense for the first time since the end of World War II.
In practical terms, armed troops could take part in UN peacekeeping operations or be dispatched to “gray zone” emergencies that have not developed into full-blown conflict.
Critics say the most troubling aspect of all is that the Japanese military could come to the aid of an ally, leaving open the possibility that Tokyo could be dragged into war at Washington’s behest.
Abe has made building a better equipped, more robust military a cornerstone of his second term as prime minister. As a prominent figure among conservative politicians who want to change the country’s view of its wartime record, he says the current constitution compromises Japan’s ability to defend itself and its allies amid Chinese military aggression and North Korea’s nuclear weapons program.
In a televised address on Tuesday, Abe said Japan would remain a pacifist state and denied that the new policy would mean sending troops into combat zones. Instead, he said it would offer better protection to Japanese. The country’s navy, for example, would be able to help protect US warships that were fighting to defend the country, he said.
“This is for the happiness of the Japanese people,” Abe said. “Japan’s status as a peaceful country will not change.”
According to a Cabinet document on the change, Tokyo would only take action if “a country’s existence is threatened, and there are clear dangers that the people’s right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness would be overturned” by an armed attack on the nation or on “countries with close ties.”
However, neighboring countries that were victims of Japanese militarism in the first half of the 20th century have warned Tokyo against abandoning its pacifist principles.
“Beijing opposes Japan’s act of hyping the China threat,” Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Hong Lei (洪磊) told reporters in Beijing. “It’s only natural for us to wonder if Japan is going to leave the path of peaceful development that it has long been pursuing.”
In Seoul, South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Noh Kwang-il said: “Our position is that the discussions should be held on the basis of the pacifist constitution, dispelling concerns among neighborhood countries stemming from history and into a direction of contributing to peace and stability in the region.”
Abe’s push to remove constitutional restraints on the military has also attracted opposition in Japan. About 10,000 people demonstrated outside his official residence on Monday evening, followed by more similar protests the next day.
“The current constitution is the result of the sacrifice of more than 3 million Japanese and more than 20 million Asian victims of war,” 74-year-old protester Yoshihiko Murata said. “We should value it more.”
Several recent opinion polls show most voters oppose the lifting of the ban on collective self-defense.
Supporters of the change said Japan is simply adopting the same defense policy as other liberal democracies at a time of increasing uncertainty in the Asia-Pacific rgion.
“What we are trying to do now is to play a more proactive role in cooperating with regional countries in setting up a framework to protect the peace and stability of the region,” Takeshi Iwaya, who heads the Liberal Democratic Party’s security research commission, told The Associated Press.
Ishida said the effective removal of the last significant constraint on Japan’s military had come at a dangerous time for the region, citing Abe’s visit to Yasukuni Shrine as part of an attempt to foment tension with China and South Korea.
The rightward shift under Abe, including the recent passage of a state secrets law, has rekindled uncomfortable memories for a man drafted to fight in a war he now believes was tragically misguided.
“The state secrets law immediately reminded me of the peace preservation law in 1928, which made it much easier to arrest people and suppress information,” Ishida said. “Now we have this new interpretation of Article 9 of the constitution that would allow Japanese forces to fight overseas. I am worried that history is repeating itself.”
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused