The controversy over whether President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) or “Mark Y.J. Ma” owes the US government tax, and whether he continues to have permanent US residency confirms that both the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) and Ma have been reticent about the truth. The AIT tried to obfuscate the issue, upon which Ma’s stooge held up the AIT’s missive as some kind of authoritative statement.
At the government’s request, the AIT’s office in Washington produced “evidence” in the form of a vaguely worded letter. It did so to comply with the wishes of the Ma administration, but it failed to convince the public, and in so doing has damaged the institute’s good name.
If the AIT had acted in good faith, it would not have used evasive terms such as “we have previously been informed,” so that when and where it had been so informed was not revealed.
If the AIT were able to clearly quote the US Department of Justice or US Citizenship and Immigration Services informing it of when and where Ma had actually “renounced” his US permanent residency status and where this renunciation had been filed, its authoritativeness and reliability would have been above question.
The AIT is a public institution invested with the authority to issue and sign official documents between the US and Taiwan, so how can it resort to phrases such as it “has been informed” to conceal its sources the way the media does?
Referring to the allegations made in a Chinese-language Next Magazine article, the AIT letter implies that Ma Ying-jeou and Mark Ma are two different people, as if Ma had absolutely nothing to do with the elusive individual who goes by the English moniker of Mark Ma.
It then goes on to say that the AIT had previously been informed that records of “President Ma’s” renunciation of his formerly held green card already exist in US immigration files, but failed to either confirm or deny records of the status of Mark Ma.
Ma’s stooge brandished the AIT letter as if it were printed in gold, clearly enjoying the moment, accusing Next Magazine of fraudulent use of identity to gain access to an individual’s personal data.
Next Magazine had checked the green card data for Ma’s English name, Mark Ma.
Meanwhile, the Presidential Office confirmed that Ma Ying-jeou and Mark Ma were, indeed, one and the same person, in a slap in the face for the AIT.
Taiwanese learned some time ago that Ma has a complicated relationship with truth-telling. His statements to the effect that the card had “automatically expired” and that he acted to renounce his residency status are both false, for otherwise he would have been more than able to produce documents stating when and where he had taken such action and when his permanent residency status had expired.
Even if his own copy of the records had been mislaid, he could always have applied directly to US immigration authorities for a duplicate, or instructed his lawyer to do so, to clear up the issue.
Instead, he chose to abuse his power and get the AIT involved, asking it to produce evidence. The whole affair has, indeed, been scandalous.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Paul Cooper
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Last week, Nvidia chief executive officer Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) unveiled the location of Nvidia’s new Taipei headquarters and announced plans to build the world’s first large-scale artificial intelligence (AI) supercomputer in Taiwan. In Taipei, Huang’s announcement was welcomed as a milestone for Taiwan’s tech industry. However, beneath the excitement lies a significant question: Can Taiwan’s electricity infrastructure, especially its renewable energy supply, keep up with growing demand from AI chipmaking? Despite its leadership in digital hardware, Taiwan lags behind in renewable energy adoption. Moreover, the electricity grid is already experiencing supply shortages. As Taiwan’s role in AI manufacturing expands, it is critical that
RSS