The controversy over whether President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) or “Mark Y.J. Ma” owes the US government tax, and whether he continues to have permanent US residency confirms that both the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) and Ma have been reticent about the truth. The AIT tried to obfuscate the issue, upon which Ma’s stooge held up the AIT’s missive as some kind of authoritative statement.
At the government’s request, the AIT’s office in Washington produced “evidence” in the form of a vaguely worded letter. It did so to comply with the wishes of the Ma administration, but it failed to convince the public, and in so doing has damaged the institute’s good name.
If the AIT had acted in good faith, it would not have used evasive terms such as “we have previously been informed,” so that when and where it had been so informed was not revealed.
If the AIT were able to clearly quote the US Department of Justice or US Citizenship and Immigration Services informing it of when and where Ma had actually “renounced” his US permanent residency status and where this renunciation had been filed, its authoritativeness and reliability would have been above question.
The AIT is a public institution invested with the authority to issue and sign official documents between the US and Taiwan, so how can it resort to phrases such as it “has been informed” to conceal its sources the way the media does?
Referring to the allegations made in a Chinese-language Next Magazine article, the AIT letter implies that Ma Ying-jeou and Mark Ma are two different people, as if Ma had absolutely nothing to do with the elusive individual who goes by the English moniker of Mark Ma.
It then goes on to say that the AIT had previously been informed that records of “President Ma’s” renunciation of his formerly held green card already exist in US immigration files, but failed to either confirm or deny records of the status of Mark Ma.
Ma’s stooge brandished the AIT letter as if it were printed in gold, clearly enjoying the moment, accusing Next Magazine of fraudulent use of identity to gain access to an individual’s personal data.
Next Magazine had checked the green card data for Ma’s English name, Mark Ma.
Meanwhile, the Presidential Office confirmed that Ma Ying-jeou and Mark Ma were, indeed, one and the same person, in a slap in the face for the AIT.
Taiwanese learned some time ago that Ma has a complicated relationship with truth-telling. His statements to the effect that the card had “automatically expired” and that he acted to renounce his residency status are both false, for otherwise he would have been more than able to produce documents stating when and where he had taken such action and when his permanent residency status had expired.
Even if his own copy of the records had been mislaid, he could always have applied directly to US immigration authorities for a duplicate, or instructed his lawyer to do so, to clear up the issue.
Instead, he chose to abuse his power and get the AIT involved, asking it to produce evidence. The whole affair has, indeed, been scandalous.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations