Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lu Hsueh-chang (呂學樟) has made his disapproval of several academics at Academia Sinica known. Unfortunately for him, Lu seems to have misunderstood one basic fact: From a legal perspective, the Academia Sinica is answerable to the Presidential Office, not, as he says, the president. He should have done his homework, for this would have saved him from being ridiculed over his understanding of the Constitution.
Article 1 of the ROC Office of the President Organization Act (中華民國總統府組織法) states: “The president shall establish the Office of the President in exercise of his/her functions and powers in accordance with the Constitution.” Article 17 of the act states: “Academia Sinica, Academia Historica, and the Management Commission of Dr Sun Yat-sen’s Mausoleum shall be under the direct administrative supervision of the Office of the President.”
So why do I say that the Academia Sinica is not directly in the president’s service? According to the Constitution, the Office of the President is a “constitutional organ” (憲政機關), the powers of which are stipulated in both Chapter 4 and Additional Article 2. “To determine major policies for national security, the president may establish a national security council and a subsidiary national security bureau. The organization of the said organs shall be stipulated by law.”
In other words, the National Security Council and National Security Bureau are organizations under the president, but the Presidential Office is in fact not an organization under the president. This is Lu’s first mistake: He does not know which organizations are under the president.
The legal basis for the Presidential Office is the ROC Office of the President Organization Act, an act that is subject to the Constitution. Here, the “Presidential Office” is where the president performs constitutional duties and handles national affairs. The office, as a constitutional organ, does not concern itself with the running of the Presidential Office, because management is the responsibility of the secretary-general of the Presidential Office.
As Article 9 of the organization act states: “The Office of the President shall have one secretary-general to the president. The secretary-general shall be a special-grade political appointee and shall, under the direction of the president, take overall charge of the affairs of the Office of the President and direct and supervise all staff.” That being so, the director of the Presidential Office is the secretary-general, not the president. This is Lu’s second mistake.
The ROC Office of the President Organization Act states that Academia Sinica is under the Presidential Office, not the president. Therefore, the supervisor of the Academia Sinica should be the secretary-general of the Presidential Office, not the president.
What is the relationship between Academia Sinica and the president? According to Article 3 of the Organization Act of Academia Sinica (中央研究院組織法), “The President of Academia Sinica, of special appointment rank, is in charge of the overall affairs of Academia Sinica ... Three candidates for the presidency are selected by the Council of Academia Sinica from the academicians, then one is appointed by the president of the ROC.” And the two’s relationship is limited to this only. So Academia Sinica is not under the president at all, and vice versa. The organization is certainly not the president’s academic “staff unit.”
That Lu made the inspection of the Academia Sinica a high-profile visit, despite rumors that he said that it should be abolished if it performed poorly, has meant that he has become a laughingstock. His lack of constitutional knowledge is also an embarrassment.
Steve Wang is an assistant professor in the Institute of European Studies at Nanhua University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused