The near-term outlook for the US economy has improved, owing to the sharp increase in household wealth last year, together with the end of the fiscal drag caused by the increase in tax rates in 2012. The US now has a chance to raise real (inflation-adjusted) per capita GDP faster than the feeble 1.7 percent average rate recorded during the four years since growth resumed in the summer of 2009.
Of course, significantly faster GDP growth this year is not guaranteed. For starters, achieving it requires overcoming the negative impact of the jump in long-term interest rates that followed the US Federal Reserve’s announcement in June last year that it would likely end its asset purchase program this year.
Moreover, the cloud of rising budget deficits at the end of the decade — and exploding national debt after that — is also discouraging investment and consumer spending.
So what happens if one looks beyond this year and asks what will happen to US economic growth over the longer term? The US Congressional Budget Office projects that real per capita GDP growth will slow from an annual rate of 2.1 percent in the 40 years before the start of the recent recession to just 1.6 percent between 2023 and 2088. The primary reason for the projected slowdown is the decrease in employment relative to the population, which reflects the aging of US society, a lower birth rate and a decelerating rise in women’s participation in the labor force. While the number of people working on average increased by 1.6 percent per year from 1970 to 2010, the office forecasts that the rate of annual employment growth will fall to just 0.4 percent in the coming decades.
A drop in annual growth of real per capita GDP from 2.1 percent to 1.6 percent looks like a substantial decline, but even if these figures are taken at face value as an indication of future living standards, they do not support the common worry that the children of today’s generation will not be as well off as their parents. An annual per capita growth rate of 1.6 percent means that a child born today will have a real income that is on average 60 percent higher at age 30 than the what his or her parents earned at the same age.
Of course, not everyone will experience the average rate of growth. Some will outperform the average 60 percent rise over the next three decades and some will not reach that level.
However, a 30-year-old in 2044 who experiences only half the average growth rate will still have a real income that is nearly 30 percent higher than the average this year — and things are even better than those numbers imply.
Although US government statisticians do their best to gauge the rise in real GDP through time, there are two problems that are very difficult to overcome in measuring real incomes: increases in the quality of goods and services and the introduction of new ones. These problems cause the official measure of real GDP growth to understate the true growth of the standard of living that real GDP is supposed to indicate.
Consider the problem of accounting for quality improvements. If a person pays the same price for some product or service this year as they did last year, but the quality of the product or service is better, their standard of living has increased. The same is true if the price rises, but the quality increases even more. Unfortunately, a government statistician cannot judge the increase in quality of everything from restaurant meals to medical care.
So looking only at the cost of a meal or of a day in the hospital causes an overestimate in the price index and an underestimate of the rise in the real standard of living.
The problem of taking new products into account is even more difficult. Virtually everyone uses a smartphone, a laptop computer or a tablet. Everyone knows what these cost and how much they add to the total nominal value of GDP, but how much more than the standard retail price would individuals pay to keep these must-have products?
Likewise, what is the value to patients of laparoscopic surgery, or drugs that relieve anxiety or prevent heart attacks?
In short, the real standard of living in the US produced by the goods and services that people buy is increasing faster than official data reveal.
That is true now and it is likely to continue to be true in the future.
However, that is not a reason for complacency, the US can and should adopt policies that will cause real incomes to rise even faster, but that is a subject for a future column.
Martin Feldstein is a professor of economics at Harvard University and president emeritus of the US National Bureau of Economic Research. He chaired former US president Ronald Reagan’s Council of Economic Advisers from 1982 to 1984.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
South China Sea exercises in July by two United States Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers reminds that Taiwan’s history since mid-1950, and as a free nation, is intertwined with that of the aircraft carrier. Eventually Taiwan will host aircraft carriers, either those built under its democratic government or those imposed on its territory by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). By September 1944, a lack of sufficient carrier airpower and land-based airpower persuaded US Army and Navy leaders to forgo an invasion to wrest Taiwan from Japanese control, thereby sparing Taiwanese considerable wartime destruction. But two
As Taiwan is engulfed in worries about Chinese infiltration, news reports have revealed that power inverters made by China’s Huawei Technologies Co are used in the solar panels on the top of the Legislative Yuan’s Zhenjiang House (鎮江會館) on Zhenjiang Street in Taipei. However, what is even more worrying is that Taiwan’s new national electronic identification card (eID) has been subcontracted to the French security firm and eID maker Idemia, which has not only cooperated with the Chinese Public Security Bureau to manufacture eIDs in China, but also makes the new identification cards being issued in Hong Kong. There might be more