During the 2008 presidential campaign, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) made a promise. That is, he assured us we would have an annual economic growth rate of 6 percent, an average annual income of US$20,000 — later increased to US$30,000 — and an unemployment rate of below 3 percent by the end of his first term. His was quite insistent about this promise and even told the public to get ready for good times. Five years later this “6-3-3” plan has been proven to be a con, and Ma himself has become a byword for liar.
Ever since he assumed office, Ma has been busy aligning the economy with China’s. Not only has production remained flat, Taiwan’s GDP is growing more slowly than any other Asian Tiger. People are struggling to make ends meet and are calling for Ma to step down. Shoes are being hurled at him wherever he goes. Yet he still relies on China, even trying to pull a fast one and sign the cross-strait service trade pact, regardless of the effect it will have on millions.
He attempted to keep everyone in the dark about the pact, even legislators in his own party, and the legislative speaker was ignorant of many of its components. Consequently, by popular insistence, the legislature was obliged to review the agreement clause by clause. Ma, infuriated by the slow progress, blamed Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平).
The Special Investigation Division wiretapped the legislature, hoping to ensnare Wang. Ma not only acted as judge and jury, announcing Wang’s guilt, he also — in his capacity as Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman — attempted to revoke Wang’s KMT membership, before holding a press conference — this time in his capacity as president — declaring that Wang was no longer fit to serve as speaker. The result? He bumbled again. His approval ratings sank to 9.2 percent, a record low for Taiwan.
We discovered why he was in such a hurry when he delivered his Double Ten National Day address. He began talking of how the people of China and the people of Taiwan were all Chinese, and how cross-strait relations were “not international relations.” The entire address was given over to the service trade pact. Apparently, Ma’s speech was for the ears of his masters in Beijing.
On Sept. 16, I wrote an article arguing that Ma’s vendetta against Wang was about opening up to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), telling Xi of his resolve that the service trade pact would be passed. The whole plan to oust Wang went ahead, at the instigation of Ma’s trusted aide and representative to the US, King Pu-tsung (金溥聰), to protect the trade pact.
If Ma fails to produce the trade pact that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) wants, it will no longer think him suitable for its purposes. He will not only lose face, he will lose the CCP’s support. Wang had to go, and the pact had to be promptly delivered. Now that he has failed to fell Wang, and has only succeeded in getting the public to turn against him, one can well imagine how concerned he is. It is no wonder, then, that he was so keen for Beijing to hear him say that “cross-strait relations are not international relations.”
If Taiwan is just a part of China, whither the Republic of China (ROC)? Ma wants to sign the service trade pact with China, and bring down the ROC. However, he cannot be allowed to bring Taiwan down with it.
If he wants to know why he is so unpopular in Taiwan, we need only reword a phrase from former US president Bill Clinton’s former aide James Carville: “It’s China, stupid.”
Twu Shiing-jer is a former Democratic Progressive Party legislator and director-general of the Department of Health.
Translated by Paul Cooper
For the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), China’s “century of humiliation” is the gift that keeps on giving. Beijing returns again and again to the theme of Western imperialism, oppression and exploitation to keep stoking the embers of grievance and resentment against the West, and especially the US. However, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that in 1949 announced it had “stood up” soon made clear what that would mean for Chinese and the world — and it was not an agenda that would engender pride among ordinary Chinese, or peace of mind in the international community. At home, Mao Zedong (毛澤東) launched
The restructuring of supply chains, particularly in the semiconductor industry, was an essential part of discussions last week between Taiwan and a US delegation led by US Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment Keith Krach. It took precedent over the highly anticipated subject of bilateral trade partnerships, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) founder Morris Chang’s (張忠謀) appearance on Friday at a dinner hosted by President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for Krach was a subtle indicator of this. Chang was in photographs posted by Tsai on Facebook after the dinner, but no details about their discussions were disclosed. With
Astride an ascended economy and military, with global influence nearing biblical proportions, Xi Jinping (習近平) — general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), chairman of the Central Military Commission and president of the People’s Republic of China — is faithfully heralded, in deeds and imagery, as a benevolent lord, determined to “build a community of common destiny for all mankind.” Rather than leading humanity to this Shangri-La through inspirational virtue a la Mahatma Gandhi or Abraham Lincoln, the CCP prefers a micromanagement doctrine of socialism with Chinese characteristics as the guiding light. A doctrine of Marxist orthodoxy transplanted under a canvas
On Sept. 8, at the high-profile Ketagalan security forum, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) urged countries to deal with the China challenge. She said: “It is time for like-minded countries, and democratic friends in the Indo-Pacific region and beyond, to discuss a framework to generate sustained and concerted efforts to maintain a strategic order that deters unilateral aggressive actions.” The “Taiwan model” to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic provides an alternative to China’s authoritarian way of handling it. Taiwan’s response to the health crisis has made it evident that countries across the world have much to learn from Taiwan’s best practices and if