At the end of World War II, 68 years ago, the government of the Republic of China (ROC) occupied Taiwan on the orders of the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers. Having taken over control of Taiwan, it ordered newspapers to stop referring to “what is commonly called Japanese rule” (日治) and call it “Japanese occupation” (日據) instead. This is why President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has used the phrase “Japanese occupation” since his childhood and why Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) memorized lessons incorporating the same phrase in his history textbooks at school. It also explains why we now hear a certain political scientist calling for the phrase “Japanese rule” in today’s textbooks to be changed back to “Japanese occupation.”
The first of these three people majored in international law, while the other two studied political science. They are all highly qualified intellectuals, but they are lacking in intellectual honesty. Ma fooled enough people to get voted into office, but even some members of his own Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) say he is incompetent and selfish. Now, he expects a single order to overturn the consensus that historians in Taiwan arrived at about using the term “Japanese rule.” It would be fair to say that although Ma lives in a glass house, he is keen on throwing stones.
When Ma and Jiang were schoolboys memorizing their lessons about the “Japanese occupation,” they must have also learned about the “Communist bandits seizing control of the mainland.” They can hardly have forgotten, either, about how KMT founder Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙) decided to foment revolution because the Manchu ancestors of former KMT secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰), had “occupied” China for more than two centuries.
In 1894, the Manchu-ruled Great Qing Empire got itself into a war with Japan over the issue of Korea, but, after suffering heavy defeats, it sued for peace the next year. The war ended with the Treaty of Shimonoseki, signed by Chinese secretary of state Li Hongzhang (李鴻章), in which it was written down that “China cedes to Japan in perpetuity and full sovereignty” Taiwan and the Penghu islands. After the treaty was signed, Japan commenced its colonial rule over Taiwan and Penghu.
Taiwanese may be “common,” but the common term they use for this period — “Japanese rule” — is an honest one. Taiwanese historians grew up under the KMT’s brainwashing education system, but after Taiwan became a democracy they reached a consensus on using the term “Japanese rule.”
Ma, however, is more concerned with pleasing the Chinese government. He is willing to let political scientists who put ideology first overturn the consensus established by historians. From this, we can see that Ma is as devoted to brainwashing as the KMT was.
The procedure by which Japan gained possession of Taiwan and Penghu was in full compliance with international law, unlike the KMT, which occupied these territories on behalf of the Allies, but whose occupation was not confirmed by the 1951 Treaty of San Francisco. Former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) wanted to use Taiwan’s democratization to turn the KMT and the ROC into Taiwanese institutions, but the Chinese government and pro-unification forces in Taiwan both labeled his efforts as maneuvers aimed at Taiwan independence.
Ma, in contrast, has a “one-China” consensus with the People’s Republic of China — the very regime that the KMT tells us “seized control” of the Chinese mainland. China says it wants to “take back” Taiwan, and the truth about Ma is that he would not mind letting China occupy Taiwan in the not-too-distant future.
James Wang is a political commentator.
Translated by Julian Clegg
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
On the eve of the 80th anniversary of Victory in Europe (VE) Day, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) made a statement that provoked unprecedented repudiations among the European diplomats in Taipei. Chu said during a KMT Central Standing Committee meeting that what President William Lai (賴清德) has been doing to the opposition is equivalent to what Adolf Hitler did in Nazi Germany, referencing ongoing investigations into the KMT’s alleged forgery of signatures used in recall petitions against Democratic Progressive Party legislators. In response, the German Institute Taipei posted a statement to express its “deep disappointment and concern”
RSS