On June 27, the Senior High-School Education Act (高級中等教育法), which introduces the 12-year national education program, passed its third reading in the legislature. The law sets a tuition-exemption threshold for senior high-school students with an annual household income greater than NT$1.48 million (US$49,000), but it does not include a sunset clause, setting a date when this exemption should expire, removing tuition fees for all students. The impact will be enormous.
This kind of policy that excludes people with a higher income violates Article 159 of the Constitution, which states that “all citizens shall have equal opportunity to receive an education.” It will also create confrontation between students from different economic backgrounds.
Some teachers’ organizations believe the act fails to address the public aspects of private schools and says that it favors private schools. Under the system, which combines junior and senior-high school into one six-year segment, many private junior-high school graduates will go directly onto the senior-high sections of their schools, giving private schools a big advantage. As a result, private schools are likely to prosper, while public schools decline.
Rewarding private schools is a violation of Article 167 of the Constitution, which states that the government must encourage or subsidize private educational enterprises that have a “good record.”
Basically, Taiwan’s educational system copies the Weimar constitution that governed Germany during the Weimar Republic between 1919 and 1933.
However, Article 162 of Taiwan’s Constitution merely states that “all public and private educational and cultural institutions in the country shall, in accordance with the law, be subject to state supervision.”
Unlike our Constitution, the Weimar constitution included complete and detailed regulations on the establishment and supervision of private schools.
Article 147 of the Weimar constitution states: “Private schools in lieu of public schools require state approval and are subject to state laws. Approval has to be granted, if the private schools do meet the standards of public schools in their educational goals as well as in their installations and in the qualification of their staff, and if they do not promote any differentiated treatment of children according to the wealth of their parents. Approval has to be withheld if the financial security of the teaching staff is insufficiently guaranteed.”
The regulations on education in the Weimar constitution were included in their entirety in Article 7 of the 1949 Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany and they were also adopted by all federal states after the unification of East and West Germany in 1990.
What this means is that Germany’s basic national policy on education has remained consistent over the past century.
In contrast, Taiwan’s educational system and policies have over the past 20 years gradually departed from the basic national policy of education as stipulated in the Constitution.
Today, many private schools continuously expand, but the standards of their facilities and teachers are inferior to those of public schools, and the financial security of their teachers is insufficiently guaranteed.
Private schools often demand that teachers recruit new students, or inflate the number of school-business cooperative projects for school evaluations to demand more educational resources from the government.
Private universities often hire retired public university professors or retired government officials to be their “educational guardians” or “educational mercenaries” to meet the school evaluation threshold requirements. By doing so, they fail to accomplish their mission of cultivating young academics.
Furthermore, board members of certain private universities give themselves certain benefits.
They ignore the rights of students, the faculty and their schools, and offer inappropriately large salaries and benefits to school presidents. For example, several private university presidents’ salaries are twice or even triple the salaries of public university presidents. The result is that teacher salaries at private universities are much lower than at public schools.
For many years, the Ministry of Education has failed to supervise private institutions in accordance with Article 162 of the Constitution.
As a result, Taiwanese education is deteriorating as the number of underperforming private schools continue to grow.
Unfortunately, the legislature did not focus on the public aspects of private schools when reviewing the act, which departs from the basic national policy of education as laid down in the Constitution.
Opposition parties should follow Article 5 of the Constitutional Interpretation Procedure Act (司法院大法官審理案件法) and gather the support of one-third of all legislators, which is the number required to file for a constitutional interpretation. They should clarify whether the act regarding the 12-year national education program violates the Constitution.
Lin Terng-yaw is a retired professor of law who taught at Tunghai University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused