The call for “a lab of our own” has emerged in the environmental movement in recent years. Take, for instance, the environmental breast cancer movement launched by the Silent Spring Institute and other environmental groups in the US in response to the fact that breast cancer research was either funded by the government or by the cosmetics industry, such as the well-known Pink Ribbon.
Most mainstream epidemiological research places too much emphasis on individual lifestyles, while ignoring the impact of environmental toxins.
The environmental breast cancer movement relies on funding from donations, rather than government or industry, and supports research on environmental toxicity as it builds its own laboratories.
The most well-known laboratory supported by small donations is located in an Italian castle — the Ramazzini Institute. Founded in 1970, the toxicology lab is the world’s second-largest animal lab, after the US National Toxicology Program.
Because it has a sufficient budget to support long-term research, the lab does not have to act as both a player and a referee in its research efforts, and can thus avoid conflicts of interest.
Both academia and governments attach great importance to its research, and it is also well-regarded by the public.
However, the controversy over environmental and occupational health hazards often requires — apart from evidence provided by toxicological research — evidence provided by epidemiological research results, as well as health risk assessments.
Establishing a toxicology laboratory that supports the environmental movement requires purchasing equipment, breeding guinea pigs and recruiting scientists, which requires money. However, setting up an environmental and occupational epidemiology lab or research office also involves another set of difficulties.
For epidemiological research and health-risk assessments, budget and space requirements are not too high. The real problems lie in the difficulty of obtaining research data.
Research on environmental and occupational health hazards are often closely related to significant business interests.
Whether it involves staff information, data on chemical substances used during the production process or waste emissions data, the data stored at government agencies are usually incomplete.
Most companies refuse to provide such information, claiming that it has been destroyed, that the law does not require them to provide such information or that the information constitutes a commercial secret.
If Taiwan’s environmental movement wants to build its own laboratory, it not only needs to raise funds and find a proper site, it also needs to seek support from the relevant government agencies. Only by creating laws requiring that data be stored and made public will Taiwan be able to remove opaqueness and uncertainty and embrace the arrival of spring.
Lin Yi-ping is an associate professor at National Yang-Ming University’s Institute of Science, Technology and Society.
Translated by Eddy Chang
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
The Iran war has exposed a fundamental vulnerability in the global energy system. The escalating confrontation between Iran, Israel and the US has begun to shake international energy markets, largely because Iran is disrupting shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. This narrow waterway carries roughly one-third of the world’s seaborne oil, making it one of the most strategically sensitive energy corridors in the world. Even the possibility of disruption has triggered sharp volatility in global oil prices. The duration and scope of the conflict remain uncertain, with senior US officials offering contradictory signals about how long military operations might continue.
RSS