Pursuit of social justice should be a long-term commitment made with continuous efforts to achieve fairness in all aspects of society. However, in light of the government’s latest about-face regarding the year-end pension bonuses for government retirees it appears the talk of reform touted by President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration is no more than a mere delaying tactic aimed at dampening public outrage.
On Tuesday last week, amid concern for the nation’s fiscal strain and a public outcry over the extra allowances given to retired public-sector employees — a decade-long practice that lacks any legal basis — Premier Sean Chen announced a proposal to slash government-sector pensioners’ year-end bonuses to cover only the disadvantaged, winning him rare praise from critics and the opposition for being responsive to public grievance.
However, the Ma government’s attempt to ensure fairness and social justice turned out to be short-lived. Its change of heart came a week later with the premier on Tuesday making a “clarification,” saying the revised policy on pension distribution is applicable for this year only and that it will be reviewed on an annual basis.
It’s dumbfounding to note how brazenly the Ma administration is playing the public for fools.
Many will remember that when Chen announced the decision last week to limit the recipients of year-end bonuses for government-sector pensioners to the socially disadvantaged and the families of those who are injured or killed in the line of duty, he cited the main reason behind the revised measure as wanting to avoid greater social divisions. The government’s latest U-turn immediately begs the question: How can the government be sure that a distribution of year-end bonuses to retired public-sector employees next year would not create similar problems?
Meanwhile, according to Chen, if the nation’s fiscal situation improves next year, the government may reinstate the pension bonus for all public-sector retirees. If that is the case, it would mean the retirement bonus for retired officials next year would be distributed around the end of 2013 or during January 2014 — conveniently in time for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) to maneuver the issue to its electoral gain come 2014’s seven-in-one elections.
This pattern is all too familiar and somewhat disturbing to say the least.
Some may recall how the Ma government, saying it empathized with the public, dropped the planned increase in fuel prices prior to the five special municipality elections in November 2010 and again before the presidential election this January. The government then, after elections were over, turned around and said the market would determine prices.
As recently as Tuesday Ma, who doubles as KMT chairman, lectured KMT officials on the importance of reform and reiterated the party’s unwavering stance in pursuing it. Ma reaffirmed KMT Legislator Alex Tsai’s (蔡正元) calls for slashing nine allowances granted to lawmakers, that are also not stipulated in law, and urged the KMT caucus to review the subsidies and give a positive response to the public’s expectation of reforming the subsidy.
A government is supposed to work its hardest to gain as much public confidence as it possibly can. However, it appears the Ma government is heading in the opposite direction, damaging its own credibility with its double standards and possessing a track record of fooling the public time and again.
The next time Ma and his government trumpet reform, they will have only themselves to blame on seeing their talk receive public suspicion in return.
After all, you can fool some of the people some of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused