Last week, the government announced the launch of the 6,150 hectare Taoyuan Aerotropolis project — requiring the expropriation of 3,211 hectares of land, the demolition of 15,000 houses and affecting the lives of 48,000 people. The government says the NT$463 billion (US$15.8 billion) project is to make Taoyuan International Airport a transport hub for East Asia, generating NT$2.3 trillion in economic benefits, NT$84 billion in tax revenue and generating 260,000 jobs.
If the project looks good on paper, without a doubt everyone will be happy, so long as the evicted residents are kept informed, well compensated and relocated effectively. However, with the exception of the zoning of the 1,770 hectare Airport Special Zone, which includes a third runway and the 705 hectares of expropriated land to be used for the Quality Living Area, details are scarce on the Aviation Services Living Area, the Trade Exhibition Area, the Airport-compatible Industrial Area, the Coastal Recreational Area, the Value-added Agriculture Exhibition and Trade Area and the Free Trade Zone, however impressive-sounding their names may be.
It is by no means clear that businesses will actually be enticed to locate there, especially since the Free Trade Zone will face the 4,435 hectare Taipei Harbor development that lies just to the north. It was only last year that the highly controversial evictions, demolitions and relocations for the harbor project were finished, so it is still impossible to know how successful attempts to attract businesses to its industrial and recreational areas will be.
Now the government is proposing another, even more ambitious plan, but it is difficult to see how simply drawing up these plans will stimulate economic development and create jobs if domestic industries do not become more competitive. All it will do is fuel land speculation and inconvenience thousands of people.
The government predicts that by 2030 Taoyuan airport’s annual passenger traffic capacity will increase to 75 million. According to the airport’s Web site, the highest figure for passenger traffic was in 2010, when it stood at 25.11 million, slipping to 24.05 million the next year. How did the government come up with the optimistic estimate for 2030 which amounts to three times current levels?
Wildly inflated claims do nobody any good. What we need to see is substantive, detailed forecast analysis of how the government proposes to increase tax revenue by NT$84 billion and create 260,000 new jobs. I have heard countless economists, urban planners and think tank members express doubts about this plan. They have their own name for it. Far be it for me to badmouth the idea, I am simply trying to caution the government not to rush into things, especially when it involves expropriating so much land and forcing people to move. Caution is advised.
Land is limited and we cannot afford to take it up with under-used industrial parks. The plan is suffering from a reality deficit. It is incumbent upon the Control Yuan to set the Cabinet straight.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has willingly signed up to the UN’s International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and its International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). He has created legislation subordinating domestic law to the covenants and obliging the government to implement them. The ICESCR requires the government to guarantee the right to housing and forbids forced evictions solely for reasons of economic development. Yet the government is contemplating embarking upon the largest program of evictions in Taiwan’s history, which will affect huge numbers of people, not just in the name of economic development, but as sacrifices for politicians desperate to hold on to power.
Chan Shun-kuei is a lawyer.
Translated by Paul Cooper
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused