Discrimination has reared its ugly face again, even if the people involved insist it is a matter of safety, not prejudice. However, it is prejudice plain, simple and ugly.
Residents of Rueilian Community (瑞聯社區) in Taoyuan County’s Bade City (八德) do not want foreign workers from Ablecome Technology living in the community because of safety concerns, and went so far as to hang up a banner saying so.
Taoyuan County Councilor Lu Lin Hsiao-feng (呂林小鳳) denied it is a case of racial discrimination.
“It has nothing to do with discrimination,” she was quoted as saying. “With 460 households and more than 1,000 residents, Rueilian is a peaceful community. They are merely worried that clashes could happen because of these foreign workers, with their different skin color and different culture, going in and out of the community.”
Different skin, different culture, different. That is the key word. Rueilian residents are not prejudiced. They just do not like anyone who is different, especially if they have darker skin. Resident Lin Feng-mei (林鳳美) said in a video clip aired by Public Television that families with children no longer felt safe playing in the community’s park because “those foreign workers also spend their leisure time in the park.” As if it were not bad enough to have to share an apartment building with foreigners, having to share an open, public space with them is even more unnerving.
Rather than being open to the idea that someone from a different country and culture living nearby offers an opportunity to learn something about another culture — or even learn that people are more alike than they are different — the people of Rueilian have chosen to close their doors and live in fear. And they are teaching their children to fear difference.
Fear was also palpable in the recent uproar about a Taiwanese university graduate who was open enough to admit that he was using his working holiday visa for Australia to do hard manual work (in a slaughterhouse) to save money for home rather than work and then spend his earnings traveling around Australia. This raised the fear among some that Taiwan could be turning into a “nation of migrant workers.”
There was much discussion of Taiwan’s stagnating economy and the government’s inability to revive the economy, but the undercurrent was that Taiwan was better than those other countries with large migrant worker populations such as the Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam and Indonesia; that being Taiwanese was better than being one of “them”, and yet here was a Taiwanese working as migrant laborer, a university graduate no less. Which just shows how little people here understand the economics of migrant work and the fact that many of the Filipinos, Indonesians and others working in blue-collar or homecare positions here or in other nations may also be university graduates. It is easier to look down on someone if all you see are differences.
Taiwan has long been a nation of migrants — the migrants from Fujian Province who came here 300 and 400 years ago, the flood of Mainlanders after the Chinese Civil War, the tens of thousands who have immigrated to the US, Canada and other countries since World War II. Think of the thousands who now work in China (or doesn’t that count?).
Many of those early immigrants to other countries encountered difficulties and prejudice, as a visit to the “Immigrants Building America” exhibition at the Chiang Kai-shek Memorial will attest. So it is tragic that their descendants are so willing to dish out that same discrimination.
It is a shame and it is a loss for a nation that has begun to proclaim — at least in government publications and promotional campaigns — that it has benefited from a melding of people and cultures: Aboriginal, Chinese, Dutch, Spanish, Japanese, to realize just how much prejudice remains. The residents of Rueilian should be ashamed — but so should many others.
Chinese state-owned companies COSCO Shipping Corporation and China Merchants have a 30 percent stake in Kaohsiung Port’s Kao Ming Container Terminal (Terminal No. 6) and COSCO leases Berths 65 and 66. It is extremely dangerous to allow Chinese companies or state-owned companies to operate critical infrastructure. Deterrence theorists are familiar with the concepts of deterrence “by punishment” and “by denial.” Deterrence by punishment threatens an aggressor with prohibitive costs (like retaliation or sanctions) that outweigh the benefits of their action, while deterrence by denial aims to make an attack so difficult that it becomes pointless. Elbridge Colby, currently serving as the Under
The Ministry of the Interior on Thursday last week said it ordered Internet service providers to block access to Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu (小紅書, also known as RedNote in English) for a year, citing security risks and more than 1,700 alleged fraud cases on the platform since last year. The order took effect immediately, abruptly affecting more than 3 million users in Taiwan, and sparked discussions among politicians, online influencers and the public. The platform is often described as China’s version of Instagram or Pinterest, combining visual social media with e-commerce, and its users are predominantly young urban women,
Most Hong Kongers ignored the elections for its Legislative Council (LegCo) in 2021 and did so once again on Sunday. Unlike in 2021, moderate democrats who pledged their allegiance to Beijing were absent from the ballots this year. The electoral system overhaul is apparent revenge by Beijing for the democracy movement. On Sunday, the Hong Kong “patriots-only” election of the LegCo had a record-low turnout in the five geographical constituencies, with only 1.3 million people casting their ballots on the only seats that most Hong Kongers are eligible to vote for. Blank and invalid votes were up 50 percent from the previous
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi lit a fuse the moment she declared that trouble for Taiwan means trouble for Japan. Beijing roared, Tokyo braced and like a plot twist nobody expected that early in the story, US President Donald Trump suddenly picked up the phone to talk to her. For a man who normally prefers to keep Asia guessing, the move itself was striking. What followed was even more intriguing. No one outside the room knows the exact phrasing, the tone or the diplomatic eyebrow raises exchanged, but the broad takeaway circulating among people familiar with the call was this: Trump did