Migration is an innate aspect of human behavior and it has for a long time been an important issue in international politics. In recent years, Taiwan has often presented itself as a “society of migrants” and the government loves to employ fine-sounding phrases like “cultural pluralism.” However, when it comes to turning these slogans into practical laws and executive measures, one often cannot see the wood for the trees.
At one time, Taiwan hoped to formally align itself with international migration practices by enacting three laws related to migration — the Immigration Act (入出國及移民法), the National Immigration Agency Organic Act (內政部入出國及移民署組織法) and the Nationality Act (國籍法), thus confirming Taiwan’s identity as a “migrant society” with respect to its laws. However, defects in the legal system mean that the infringement of migrants’ rights is still happening as before. At present, the most serious policy discrimination is directed toward stateless people who end up being treated as “refugees.”
Following exposure by Taiwanese civic groups and the media, the issue of how refugees are treated has once again been raised in Taiwan. A case in point is documentary filmmaker Bibi Tsai (蔡詠晴) and her Tibetan husband, Lhundup Tsering. When Lhundup Tsering applied for residency, the authorities refused to grant him resident status based on joining his family. This was partly because the Ministry of Foreign Affairs does not recognize the “yellow book” identity certificate and partly because of political considerations stemming from Taiwan’s non-recognition of Tibet.
Lhundup Tsering’s case is not an isolated one — there have been other cases of stateless people in Taiwan. Over the years, whenever such situations arise, the government has generally handled them as “special cases.” This may help confirm Taiwan’s reputation as a humanitarian country, but it does not fix the conditions that cause such problems.
Many people think there is no refugee problem in Taiwan. Some officials even deny that refugees have been living in Taiwan for a long time. However, not talking about the problem will not make it go away.
In 2009, the legislature ratified two international human rights conventions — the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. The government bragged that adopting these brought Taiwan in line with global human rights standards. However, a report by Amnesty International last month directly points out the infringement of migrants’ and migrant workers’ rights within Taiwan.
As for the proposed refugee law that authorities said they want to enact as a priority, it was given a first reading in 2007, when the Democratic Progressive Party was in office, but since President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) took over in 2008, little more has been heard of the bill.
June 20 was World Refugee Day, as designated by the UN. Refugee problems keep manifesting all around the world, and it would be good if people in Taiwan would give the issue some attention. Refugee crises in Myanmar and Sudan, which are being reported by the media and civic groups, call for concern and action from more Taiwanese.
Apart from that, we should take a look at our country and society as well. We need to think about how to ensure that society treats migrants, migrant workers and refugees in a friendlier manner. We should enact the proposed refugee law and fix the defects in laws and regulations related to migration. These are clearly tasks that Taiwan needs to tackle in response to the expectations of the international community.
Yang Tsung-li is the director of Amnesty International Taiwan.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China