Youthful knowledge gap
Article 158 of the Constitution stipulates that education and culture shall aim to develop among citizens a national spirit, a spirit of self-government, national morality, a good physique, scientific knowledge and the ability to earn a “living.” Article 7 of the National Education Act (國民教育法) also states that the curricula for elementary and junior-high schools shall be centered around national spirit and a “living” education for citizens. In terms of basic education, the school system in Taiwan has focused mainly on teaching students what they need for “living.”
Basic education in Taiwan includes social programs, such as citizenship and living education. With these subjects, the public will acquire a basic knowledge about civil law, criminal law and legal proceedings after completing their compulsory education. Perhaps the public does not understand the legal system as thoroughly as lawyers do; however, understanding basic legal concepts has become “common sense” for Taiwanese. That said, pupils are not taught anything about labor laws in school and do not even learn about labor regulations when they become employees which could be useful for “self-protection” in the workplace.
For instance, a 15-year-old teenager who just graduated from junior-high school may already have had work experience or a part-time job without knowing that, under Article 44 of the Labor Standards Act (勞動基準法), they are classified as child workers. According to Article 6 of the Labor Insurance Act (勞工保險條例), any teenager in employment qualifies for insurance and is even entitled to pension rights. According to Article 14 of the same act, the young worker is entitled to take 6 percent of their pension as “savings.”
If people are not familiar with these tenets of labor laws, they will not know their workers’ rights as protected by Article 44 to Article 48 of the Labor Standards Act. Aside from teenage workers, everybody will either be an employer or an employee in the working world after completing their education. If workers and their employers lack knowledge of labor laws, then their rights in their respective roles cannot be properly respected. In conclusion, the government should include labor-related laws as part of the curriculum of “citizenship and living education” in schools.
According to the monthly report on labor statistics released by the Council of Labor Affairs in April, there are 11.2 million workers in Taiwan, of which, 872,000 are aged between 15 and 24.
The nation is expecting the government to institute labor protection for the youth as soon as possible.
Yi Chun Chang
The Foundation of Chinese Labor Management Affairs
A god among mere mortals
“Traffic” is an interminable issue to discuss (in vain); something that always makes me apoplectic — no, not the topic, but the demeanor of Taiwanese in traffic.
If there is any room after this topic is discussed for further conversation, then it may continue on the topic of “social conduct” — which also receives a way “below par” score from me.
To proceed with my haranguing: If anyone is still not sated by now, how about dealing with the presumptuous cretins of everyday Taiwanese who has (sic) no concept of social conduct, respect and integrity?
Another harbinger of a society’s nadir: infrastructure and general education.
Would that suffice for “conversation” among foreigners?
By the way, all this has already been reflected on in my book Cultural Shock — Taiwan, which I published last year.
Some may wonder why I stay here when I am so virulently critical; you can call it a mission. Just like the Mormons, I am on one too, for the betterment of Taiwanese society.
Besides, I am “stuck” here since I am married to a Taiwanese woman (who by the way, is only Taiwanese by birth, not by her behavior and low standards).
I welcome your comments, I can be reached at: budosport@hotmail.com
Georg Woodman
Address withheld
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) first suggested a mass recall of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, the Taipei Times called the idea “not only absurd, but also deeply undemocratic” (“Lai’s speech and legislative chaos,” Jan. 6, page 8). In a subsequent editorial (“Recall chaos plays into KMT hands,” Jan. 9, page 8), the paper wrote that his suggestion was not a solution, and that if it failed, it would exacerbate the enmity between the parties and lead to a cascade of revenge recalls. The danger came from having the DPP orchestrate a mass recall. As it transpired,
Sitting in their homes typing on their keyboards and posting on Facebook things like, “Taiwan has already lost its democracy,” “The Democratic Progressive Party is a party of green communists,” or “President William Lai [賴清德] is a dictator,” then turning around and heading to the convenience store to buy a tea egg and an iced Americano, casually chatting in a Line group about which news broadcast was more biased this morning — are such people truly clear about the kind of society in which they are living? This is not meant to be sarcasm or criticism, but an exhausted honesty.
Much has been said about the significance of the recall vote, but here is what must be said clearly and without euphemism: This vote is not just about legislative misconduct. It is about defending Taiwan’s sovereignty against a “united front” campaign that has crept into the heart of our legislature. Taiwanese voters on Jan. 13 last year made a complex decision. Many supported William Lai (賴清德) for president to keep Taiwan strong on the world stage. At the same time, some hoped that giving the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) a legislative majority would offer a
RSS