Youthful knowledge gap
Article 158 of the Constitution stipulates that education and culture shall aim to develop among citizens a national spirit, a spirit of self-government, national morality, a good physique, scientific knowledge and the ability to earn a “living.” Article 7 of the National Education Act (國民教育法) also states that the curricula for elementary and junior-high schools shall be centered around national spirit and a “living” education for citizens. In terms of basic education, the school system in Taiwan has focused mainly on teaching students what they need for “living.”
Basic education in Taiwan includes social programs, such as citizenship and living education. With these subjects, the public will acquire a basic knowledge about civil law, criminal law and legal proceedings after completing their compulsory education. Perhaps the public does not understand the legal system as thoroughly as lawyers do; however, understanding basic legal concepts has become “common sense” for Taiwanese. That said, pupils are not taught anything about labor laws in school and do not even learn about labor regulations when they become employees which could be useful for “self-protection” in the workplace.
For instance, a 15-year-old teenager who just graduated from junior-high school may already have had work experience or a part-time job without knowing that, under Article 44 of the Labor Standards Act (勞動基準法), they are classified as child workers. According to Article 6 of the Labor Insurance Act (勞工保險條例), any teenager in employment qualifies for insurance and is even entitled to pension rights. According to Article 14 of the same act, the young worker is entitled to take 6 percent of their pension as “savings.”
If people are not familiar with these tenets of labor laws, they will not know their workers’ rights as protected by Article 44 to Article 48 of the Labor Standards Act. Aside from teenage workers, everybody will either be an employer or an employee in the working world after completing their education. If workers and their employers lack knowledge of labor laws, then their rights in their respective roles cannot be properly respected. In conclusion, the government should include labor-related laws as part of the curriculum of “citizenship and living education” in schools.
According to the monthly report on labor statistics released by the Council of Labor Affairs in April, there are 11.2 million workers in Taiwan, of which, 872,000 are aged between 15 and 24.
The nation is expecting the government to institute labor protection for the youth as soon as possible.
Yi Chun Chang
The Foundation of Chinese Labor Management Affairs
A god among mere mortals
“Traffic” is an interminable issue to discuss (in vain); something that always makes me apoplectic — no, not the topic, but the demeanor of Taiwanese in traffic.
If there is any room after this topic is discussed for further conversation, then it may continue on the topic of “social conduct” — which also receives a way “below par” score from me.
To proceed with my haranguing: If anyone is still not sated by now, how about dealing with the presumptuous cretins of everyday Taiwanese who has (sic) no concept of social conduct, respect and integrity?
Another harbinger of a society’s nadir: infrastructure and general education.
Would that suffice for “conversation” among foreigners?
By the way, all this has already been reflected on in my book Cultural Shock — Taiwan, which I published last year.
Some may wonder why I stay here when I am so virulently critical; you can call it a mission. Just like the Mormons, I am on one too, for the betterment of Taiwanese society.
Besides, I am “stuck” here since I am married to a Taiwanese woman (who by the way, is only Taiwanese by birth, not by her behavior and low standards).
I welcome your comments, I can be reached at: budosport@hotmail.com
Georg Woodman
Address withheld
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
On Sunday, 13 new urgent care centers (UCC) officially began operations across the six special municipalities. The purpose of the centers — which are open from 8am to midnight on Sundays and national holidays — is to reduce congestion in hospital emergency rooms, especially during the nine-day Lunar New Year holiday next year. It remains to be seen how effective these centers would be. For one, it is difficult for people to judge for themselves whether their condition warrants visiting a major hospital or a UCC — long-term public education and health promotions are necessary. Second, many emergency departments acknowledge
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
RSS