The optimism seen in global financial markets during the first three months of the year is already giving way to renewed uncertainty about the outlook for the world economy.
In the autumn of last year, financial markets feared a double-dip recession in the US, a hard landing for China’s economy and a collapse in the eurozone. None of these things happened, as economic data in both the US and China proved stronger than the markets feared, and the actions of the European Central Bank (ECB) pulled the eurozone back from the brink.
I did not share the fears about the US and China, but it was interesting to observe how market sentiment moved from one extreme of too much pessimism to the other extreme of over-optimism during this period. This helps to explain the rallies seen in the first quarter of this year. Now, market sentiment is adjusting to a situation somewhere in between.
This makes sense. The world economy continues to recover after the crisis, but the picture varies greatly: A fragile West contrasts with a resilient East.
Across Asia and many parts of the emerging world economies are in much better shape, but even in these regions, the picture varies. In China, for instance, the economy is cooling after the authorities tightened policy last year in order to squeeze inflation. Now, the focus in China is both on political change and on moving the economy to the next stage of development.
In the US, meanwhile, the good news is that the economy is continuing to grow, but the bad news is that the recovery is not particularly strong. It is steady, not spectacular. In the US, like the UK, the biggest firms appear in good shape, with healthy balance sheets, but for now, they appear reluctant to invest. There is still an overhang of debt, and it will take time for people and firms to deleverage. In addition, whereas the UK government has already taken big strides to try and reduce its deficit, in the US many of these problems are being left until after the presidential election.
Although the outcome for the world economy will be heavily influenced by the US and China, it is developments in the eurozone that continue to drive sentiment. The biggest threat facing the global economy is a collapse of one or more of the economies in the eurozone.
That is why markets were so relieved by the actions of the ECB. In December last year, the bank provided cheap three-year money to banks that wanted to borrow. The success of that led the ECB to repeat the exercise in February this year. Its actions removed the immediate fear of a funding crisis for banks across continental Europe, and provided valuable time for the eurozone to address its problems.
Recent months have highlighted three types of adjustment, none of which is particularly popular.
First, if the economies on the periphery were not in the eurozone, they would now be seeing major currency devaluations, but because they are in the eurozone, they are having to endure “internal devaluations” instead, which are squeezing their economies very hard. The result is recession and rising unemployment.
It is difficult for the markets to know which of these economies is the most important to focus on. Is it Greece, which may need further external help as its recession deepens? Is it Ireland, which has done all that has been asked of it but has slipped back into recession? Or is it Portugal, which some fear may be the next in trouble after Greece? Or is it Italy, the biggest peripheral economy, where an unelected government is now pushing through cuts demanded by Germany (among others)? Or is it Spain, where the government was elected only last autumn on a mandate of austerity but is already running into trouble as youth unemployment rises? To these one could add worries about France, where the presidential election adds to political, as well as economic uncertainty in Europe.
Yet, it is not just the periphery that is adjusting. In good economic times, the eurozone worked, with money flowing from the centre to the periphery creating the booms that have since become busts.
Indeed, before the crisis started, both Ireland and Spain had stronger fiscal positions than Germany.
It was only during the bust that their budgets deteriorated. Now, in the bad times, the money that previously went to the periphery is attracted back to the eurozone core. This is adding to inflation in Germany. The Germans do not like this, but there is little they can immediately do. After all, if the ECB raises interest rates to curb inflation in Germany, this will make the economic situation on the periphery worse.
The third area of adjustment is equally worrying for Germany. Because of imbalances between economies across Europe, adjustments also have to take place via central banks. This is not a worry if you think the euro will survive, but it starts to become a concern if there is a risk of any country leaving the system, as there is now. Germany’s central bank, the Bundesbank, has the biggest exposure to others, currently about 550 billion euros (US$722.5 billion) and rising. No wonder there is concern in Frankfurt and Berlin.
There are several ways this could play out. The euro system has to change to survive, and this includes moving faster towards a single political union, where the core provides more help to the periphery.
Taxpayers in Germany and elsewhere fear this. Yet there is little doubt that Germany is one of the biggest beneficiaries of the euro, as its manufacturing base does not have to contend with an overvalued currency, as does Switzerland’s. However, in return for “more Europe”, countries like Germany will demand greater say over the policies being implemented in Spain, Portugal and other countries.
They may tolerate this to begin with, but if growth does not follow, and there is instead austerity and recession, anti-euro sentiment is likely to rise, as it has in Greece. So the remainder of this year is likely to see renewed uncertainty over the eurozone, as was the case last year.
Gerard Lyons is chief economist at Standard Chartered Bank.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused