Toward the end of this year, the 18th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will be convened to oversee a transfer of power from the party’s present leadership to the next generation.
Just as people were expecting to see the names of the new leaders emerge, we had the curious events of earlier this month, in which Chongqing Deputy Mayor Wang Lijun (王立軍) turned up at the US consulate in Chengdu, reportedly seeking political asylum.
The incident was met with a strong reaction in China and keen interest from abroad, as a conflict almost broke out between police officers from the two cities. The symbolic significance of all this and the tantalizing glimpse it affords of what is happening behind the scenes is indeed noteworthy.
The incident and the response should serve as a wake-up call to the few people in Taiwan who still view China through rose-tinted spectacles. It should help them face the fact that China is still a society on the edge, both politically and economically.
Ever since it was founded, transfers of power within the People’s Republic of China have been mired in the power struggles that are the necessary product of communist dictatorships. In the early days these power struggles were particularly ferocious, often going beyond internal party struggles to involve mass movements and even intervention by the army. They were enough to send the entire country to the brink of civil war.
In ancient times, transfers of power in China took the form of dynastic change in which imperial power was wrested from the incumbent. Not much changed when the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) took over, although it did so under the banner of putting an end to feudalism. Indeed, power transfers under this new regime were every bit as barbaric and violent, if not more so, than under the old system. With every transfer of power the contenders sought not just to topple their opponents, but to wipe out any trace of dissent, often getting ordinary people involved and leading to the imprisonment, or even death, of millions.
Following the death of former Chinese leader Mao Zedong (毛澤東), party, political and military power became consolidated in the hands of former paramount leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), who had very few, if any, serious challengers. Deng instigated a path of economic reform and opening up to the outside world and, under the name of socialist market economics, started China on the road of state capitalism and long-term growth. Where the economic system may have changed, however, the political system did not. There is a well-established system for the exercise and transmission of power, but it is exclusively controlled by a small, powerful elite.
The system of power transfer in the CCP operates in a way we might find difficult to conceive. The party’s second-generation leader, Deng, not only chose his successor, Jiang Zemin (江澤民), but also decided in advance who was to be Jiang’s successor: Hu Jintao (胡錦濤). Now that Hu is president, his own successor is all but decided, as Hu is presumed to have nominated Vice President Xi Jinping (習近平) to follow him.
This invention of the Chinese communists, these Chinese-style politico-economic development models that they call “socialist democracy” and “socialist market economics,” are just veils. In essence they are completely in line with Chinese communist ideology.
Market economics is a misnomer, as everything is still controlled by the state, not the market. State-run companies and the government call the shots in any given industry, including matters such as where domestic economic growth is to be concentrated, as well as overseas acquisitions, all of which are decided according to the CCP’s instructions. Notably, the Chinese government still lays out one five-year plan after another, through which it guides and controls the direction of economic development.
In politics, too, there is nothing that the CCP does not control. The party controls the government, and the party itself is under the control of a small political elite. Because the party leads the government, it is the ultimate source of power. It is in command of all executive, legislative, judicial and military affairs. Consequently, the National People’s Congress, which is supposed to be the equivalent of a parliament or congress in a democratic country, is really little more than a rubber stamp for the political institution that holds the real power, which is the CCP.
The core of power in the country as a whole is the Political Bureau of the CCP Central Committee, or politburo, while the Politburo Standing Committee is a core within a core. Each member of the politburo is responsible for a certain area or areas of business, and the general secretary is the one with the final say.
Although democracy often appears to be disorganized, it is actually quite a stable framework, especially as it allows change to come through the ballot instead of the bullet.
Compare this with the situation in China, where the state apparatus is in the hands of a tiny, unelected elite. Being unelected, the members of this elite have no mandate and no legitimacy. In addition, many disparate voices and interests are forcibly suppressed so that their needs and demands cannot be resolved within the system, and this sows the seeds of conflict and division. As a result of this long-standing suppression, China is riddled with internal contradictions, rather like a nuclear reactor that is weakened by cracks.
When someone as important as Wang presents himself, amid a power struggle, at the US embassy in Chengdu seeking political asylum, it shows that China’s political crisis is getting to a point where it could explode.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China