Lu betrays her factionalism
In a press conference on Tuesday, former vice president Annette Lu (呂秀蓮), said that pursuit of a “generational change” within the leadership had caused the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to lose by 800,000 votes in last month’s presidential election. To rectify the error, she proposed a “lineage perpetuation” (薪火相傳) approach instead.
“Lineage perpetuation” is a traditional biological “seeding” expression that is also associated in Taiwan with the continuation of a family clan. In the context of Lu’s statement it has a double meaning. It suggests, on the one hand, that the old revolutionaries, herself being one of them, had been sidestepped.
On the other hand, it suggests that DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) is an upstart, who was expediently grafted onto the party not too long ago, and is short on legitimacy to represent the DPP. Hence the loss.
We lament the fact that the DPP lost its presidential bid, because we had hoped that it would win. However, to blame the loss on the generational shift within the party is an insidious oversimplification. If we are to find the causes, we can find a million of them, from ballot fixing to high-stakes underground betting, from vote buying to the intervention of the US and China, or even the will of heaven. The range is as wide and as mind-boggling as the great variety of idols housed in the countless temples throughout the country.
At her press conference, Lu also stressed that what the DPP needs is a leader with a strong personality, capable of dealing with problems courageously and decisively.
The underlying message was to challenge and to discredit the outgoing chairperson’s leadership.
Lu acknowledged the problem of factionalism within the DPP. Unfortunately, her very own words betray the factional spirit she hopes to address.
Yang Chun-hui
Utah
Do not play by KMT rules
Recently, former DPP presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) suggested that the party should review its China policy and move toward the center to reduce the unease of swing voters and woo their votes. Hearing this from someone of Hsieh’s caliber, one can only shake one’s head.
What makes the DPP different from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is the DPP’s insistence on Taiwan’s sovereignty, dignity, freedom and democracy when it comes to dealing with China. These differences are quintessential DPP values.
Yes, China is a rising power in terms of its economy, military strength and diplomacy. As the nation is so close to China geographically, Taiwan should take the chance to be a strategic partner of China.
However, it should not put all its eggs in one basket. After all, China is ruled by a single-party authoritarian system and has explicit territorial ambitions toward Taiwan. Relying too much and too deeply on China, the country will fall into China’s trap and the results will write off all of the nation’s achievements.
In addition, the so-called centrists in Taiwan are people who have no strong political ideology. Like most people, they want prosperity and to live with security and stability, but they don’t care who is their master, or if they live in a one-China cage or if they possess other noble, intangible values. No — most of them are ignorant of Taiwanese history and politics. These ignorant people are people the DPP should try to educate and convert, not the other way around.
So much unfairness and injustice occurred during the recent elections. The KMT resorted to many undemocratic and underhand methods to win. Still, the cold fact is that the country’s voters are not mature or wise enough to make an independent and intelligent choice. They are easily moved by coercion by China and bought off by money, and brainwashed 24 hours a day, seven days a week by subliminal information from the pro-China media. That’s why many Hakkas, Aborigines, military personnel, government employees and teachers have negative feelings toward the DPP and will never vote DPP until something is done to change their perceptions.
In light of the current tactics and strategies used by the KMT, the future of the nation’s democracy is bleak and the DPP will probably continue to lose in future elections if it sticks to the KMT’s game rules.
Yang Ji-charng
Columbus, Ohio
The US Senate’s passage of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which urges Taiwan’s inclusion in the Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercise and allocates US$1 billion in military aid, marks yet another milestone in Washington’s growing support for Taipei. On paper, it reflects the steadiness of US commitment, but beneath this show of solidarity lies contradiction. While the US Congress builds a stable, bipartisan architecture of deterrence, US President Donald Trump repeatedly undercuts it through erratic decisions and transactional diplomacy. This dissonance not only weakens the US’ credibility abroad — it also fractures public trust within Taiwan. For decades,
In 1976, the Gang of Four was ousted. The Gang of Four was a leftist political group comprising Chinese Communist Party (CCP) members: Jiang Qing (江青), its leading figure and Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) last wife; Zhang Chunqiao (張春橋); Yao Wenyuan (姚文元); and Wang Hongwen (王洪文). The four wielded supreme power during the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976), but when Mao died, they were overthrown and charged with crimes against China in what was in essence a political coup of the right against the left. The same type of thing might be happening again as the CCP has expelled nine top generals. Rather than a
Taiwan Retrocession Day is observed on Oct. 25 every year. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government removed it from the list of annual holidays immediately following the first successful transition of power in 2000, but the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-led opposition reinstated it this year. For ideological reasons, it has been something of a political football in the democratic era. This year, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) designated yesterday as “Commemoration Day of Taiwan’s Restoration,” turning the event into a conceptual staging post for its “restoration” to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The Mainland Affairs Council on Friday criticized
The topic of increased intergenerational conflict has been making headlines in the past few months, showcasing a problem that would only grow as Taiwan approaches “super-aged society” status. A striking example of that tension erupted on the Taipei MRT late last month, when an apparently able-bodied passenger kicked a 73-year-old woman across the width of the carriage. The septuagenarian had berated and hit the young commuter with her bag for sitting in a priority seat, despite regular seats being available. A video of the incident went viral online. Altercations over the yielding of MRT seats are not common, but they are
RSS