President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) new Cabinet will soon be up and running. Although its members might seem very pleased with themselves, it is imperative that they do not underestimate the serious challenges facing the nation. Given that the European debt crisis is likely to have only a passing impact on Taiwan, the fundamental challenge remains economic restructuring and the ability to play a meaningful role in international economic integration.
These issues require not only political will on the part of the government, but also a softer approach that makes optimal use of integration and coordination capabilities.
On Jan. 1, when Taiwan was still in the throes of election fever, the free-trade agreement (FTA) between the US and South Korea came into effect. The US removed import taxes on 82 percent of all product categories of South Korean exports to the US. South Korea’s FTA partners now account for 60 percent of the global economy
Seoul has signed nine free-trade deals, among them agreements with ASEAN, India, the EU and the US. It is also engaged in FTA talks with another seven economic entities, and talks with China and Japan are scheduled to begin later this year.
By comparison, Taiwan has signed agreements with five Central American states. The nation is currently discussing another agreement with Singapore, but the trade volume covered by these deals accounts for only 3.6 percent of Taiwan’s total foreign trade. Late last year, Taiwan and New Zealand announced that they were evaluating the feasibility of an economic cooperation agreement, but in terms of trade volume that will make up just 0.2 percent of total foreign trade.
Ma hopes that Taiwan will be able to join the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) at some point in the next 10 years, but he still has not produced a plan to that end. Furthermore, given the speed at which East Asian economic integration is progressing, the question is whether Taiwan can afford to wait 10 years to join the TPP.
Taiwan’s ranking in the IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook, improved from 18th in 2007 to 6th last year. However, a more realistic measure of national competitiveness would be to look at foreign investment, international capital flows and domestic investment in Taiwan.
In the three years after Ma’s election in 2008, annual real foreign investment fell by 50.8 percent, 33.4 percent and 29.1 percent, respectively. Even with the implementation of the cross-strait Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA), foreign investment in Taiwan only increased by 7.6 percent last year, to US$3.4 billion. According to UN data, Taiwan’s foreign direct investment (FDI) as part of global FDI fell from 0.37 percent in 2007 to 0.31 percent in 2008, 0.25 percent in 2009 and 0.2 percent in 2010. This is less than the other three Asian tiger economies, and does not even amount to half of the FDI received by Vietnam.
A look at international capital flows, including both direct investment and securities investments, shows that Taiwan’s international competitive advantage is fast disappearing. Between 2000 and 2007, under the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government, average annual net international investment in Taiwan was a negative US$13.23 billion. Between 2008 and 2010, under the first Ma administration, the figure was a negative US$20.08 billion. During the first three quarters of last year, net international investment in Taiwan was a negative US$46.5 billion, a larger capital outflow than in any year in the past.
Taiwan’s domestic investment is increasingly losing its dynamism. During the 1990s, the real investment rate was 28 percent. During the eight years under the DPP it dropped to 23.7 percent. During Ma’s first four years in office, it fell further, to an annual average of 17.7 percent. Last year it remained low at 17.2 percent, the second-lowest on record.
The Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics has forecast that the real investment rate for this year will drop to 16.6 percent, which would be yet another historic low.
While the ECFA presented an opportunity for cross-strait integration, it is only a framework agreement and will not strengthen Taiwan’s export competitiveness. In 2007, Taiwan accounted for 10.6 percent of China’s import market, a number that by 2010 had shrunk to 8.3 percent. By the time the ECFA early harvest list came into effect early last year, that share had dropped to 7.2 percent, and by December last year, it had fallen still further, to 6.8 percent.
Faced with the challenges posed by globalization, the pressures on Taiwan’s international competitiveness have increased sharply. It can only be hoped that the new Cabinet will be able to implement sweeping structural reform, overcome the difficulties faced by the nation in terms of its efforts to participate in international economic integration and bring change and reform to the national economy.
Tung Chen-yuan is a professor at National Chengchi University’s Graduate Institute of Development Studies.
Translated by Perry Svensson
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused