The presidential election is almost upon us. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has dredged up the Yu Chang affair again, trying to deliver a fatal blow to the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) candidate, Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文). However, it may have backfired, and it is possible this could be the last straw, the one that breaks the back of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) campaign. He has failed to hurt Tsai and he has not done himself any favors either.
The Taiwan eNews Web site made the interesting observation that this election has been the pettiest, most negative campaign ever. True, bringing in the Yu Chang affair was petty, negative campaigning. The KMT is the governing party, so why is it resorting to negative tactics? This simply reflects its lack of positive achievements. The KMT already looks defeated — Ma is staring at the writing on the wall. Even Council for Economic Planning and Development (CEPD) Minister Christina Liu (劉憶如), who originally demanded the classified documents concerning TaiMed, has admitted that the case does not involve illegal conduct, only procedural irregularities.
Frankly, we already know nothing illegal happened, because all previous accusations — that Tsai intented to feather her own nest, violated the “revolving door” clause and abused her access to state funds — have been dismissed. This talk of procedural irregularities is either the KMT looking for an excuse to back down or an attempt to allocate at least some blame to Tsai in the absence of anything more substantial.
Is the furor over this case in the public interest? KMT Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平), one of the original proponents of the Act for the Development of Biotech and New Pharmaceuticals Industry (生技新藥產業發展條例), spoke the truth when he said the biotechnology issue involved the fortunes of the nation, because without this legislation, investment in biotechnology and new drugs would be jeopardized. He could have gone further, though. A few days ago, Academia Sinica president Wong Chi-huey (翁啟惠) said during an interview that biotechnology was to be the engine of future economic growth in Taiwan.
Following Wong’s lead, another two Academia Sinica scientists involved in Yu Chang chose to stand up and cry foul at the unfair accusations against Tsai. And so we have a situation in which three academics are opposing the KMT.
The three have been obliged to defend Tsai for a very simple reason: to be witness to the facts. Wong said that when Tsai was vice premier, she did not know she would go on to head Yu Chang, nor could she have known she would become party chairperson, let alone a presidential candidate. Wong’s point is that if Tsai was not standing in this election, there would have been none of this “implicating the innocent.” Furthermore, Wong was keen to say Tsai only agreed to the position at the request of others.
Wong’s involvement has shifted the focus of the Yu Chang affair away from Tsai and onto him. Who are the public to believe? Wong or the KMT? Who commands the most public trust? Oh, Ma, what a tangled web we weave.
Wong would have preferred not to have gotten involved in politics, but the Yu Chang affair has forced this apolitical figure and two other academics to support Tsai. There is a Chinese expression that means “to follow in the tracks of an overturned cart,” which aptly describes the KMT’s actions over the past few weeks.
First, they created the conditions for the success of the DPP’s “three little pigs” campaign donations initiative by having the Control Yuan clamp down on political donations to the DPP. Next, they obliged three academics to comment on the Yu Chang affair. It is almost as if Ma’s campaign team were concerned Tsai lacked resources and would not get enough votes, and decided to give her a boost, inspiring the public to donate money and getting some of the most respected academics in the country to declare their support for her.
How very sporting.
Chin Heng-wei is a political commentator.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS