The US has announced it will not sell Taiwan F-16C/Ds, but will upgrade its F-16A/Bs. Taiwan’s fighter jets are old, while the capabilities of China’s jets keep improving, expanding the gap between China’s and Taiwan’s air forces. The US arms package is like a short rain after a long drought — it won’t end the drought, but it will bring short-term relief. Taiwan may be unhappy about the deal, but must accept it.
The Ministry of National Defense (MND), the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Presidential Office and the Cabinet applauded the US’ decision. A pleased President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) tried to claim credit, saying the arms purchase budget since he took office has exceeded that of former president Lee Teng-hui’s (李登輝) 12 years in office and former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) eight years in office. He also said this proves he has done more to improve the military’s war preparedness than Lee and Chen together.
Trying to prove that Ma is focusing on national defense merely by pointing to the arms procurement budget does not reveal the full extent of the government’s national defense policies.
During Lee’s time in office, the US was not Taiwan’s only arms source — France provided Mirage jets and Lafayette-class frigates, while Germany provided minesweepers. Lee’s presidency was also the high point for domestic arms development, with the production of eight Cheng Kung-class frigates and 130 Indigenous Defense Fighters (IDF), which laid the groundwork for Taiwan’s current national defense.
Because international arms purchase channels dried up during the Chen presidency, arms procurement focused on the US. Kidd-class frigates and long-range early warning radar systems are the most well-known purchases, but the purchase of Patriot PAC-3 missiles, diesel-powered submarines and anti-submarine aircraft was blocked dozens of times in the legislature by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) because of political infighting. The US might have been prepared to sell these weapons systems, but the chaotic Taiwanese legislative situation forced Washington to stand by and wait.
First, the KMT tied the hands of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government and blocked the military upgrades, and now it is bragging that it has purchased more arms than the previous two administrations. That is shameful.
Although the US has sold a total of US$18 billion in defense-related items to the Ma administration, a closer look shows that whether it be Black Hawk helicopters, Apache attack helicopters or Patriot PAC-3 missiles, the procurement applications had been initiated by the DPP government. However, following the Typhoon Morakot disaster in August 2009, Taiwan’s lack of large helicopters not only caused the US to send helicopters to assist in the rescue effort, Washington also announced not long after that it had agreed to sell helicopters to Taiwan. In other words, Ma reaped the benefits of what others had sowed.
The Ma administration has been strongly criticized for neglecting national defense and is now making a big propaganda number of the US’ decision to upgrade our aging fighter jets. Although the government had budgeted a mere NT$2 million (US$65,700) for the purchase of F-16C/Ds, it is bragging about its accomplishments by only comparing how much the previous two administrations had spent on arms procurement, which is deception at its worst.
Governmental policy implementation is a continuous process: The Chen administration reaped the benefits of the Lee administration’s work and the Ma administration is now reaping the benefits of the Chen administration’s work. It’s time Ma started thinking about what his administration will be able to leave for the next administration.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
RSS