In the face of the US credit rating downgrade, the European sovereign debt crisis and the long-term Japanese economic downturn, the international community suspects that we are walking into a second recession.
At the moment, many people believe that this would further highlight the importance of China. Indeed, China has become more important, but not as a savior. Rather, it might be the source of crisis. Even World Bank President Robert Zoellick said as much in his letter to the Wall Street Journal on Sept. 1.
EXPORT-RELIANT
China’s economic model is to earn foreign currency from exporting goods produced on license. As consumer demand in China’s primary export markets — Europe, the US and Japan — shrinks, the driving force behind Chinese economic growth slows down.
To make up the shortfall, China needed to expand domestic demand, but was frustrated in these efforts because of bureaucratic corruption — the high-speed train crash in July serving as a case in point.
There has also been severe inflationary pressure, exacerbated by Beijing’s insistence on its export-oriented policy of undervaluing the yuan. Beijing has no intention of dropping this policy, and this has suppressed domestic demand and accelerated inflationary pressure, widening income disparities and worsening other social problems.
Zoellick believes that China has to push for structural reforms, including political reform, in order to handle its economic transformation. However, if its reforms fail, not only China but the whole world will suffer. A second recession is not impossible if Beijing does not change its export-reliant model.
Zoellick’s remarks are not new. They echo global concerns about Chinese economic development over the past two or three years.
Since 2009, the European, US, Japanese and South Korean chambers of commerce have repeatedly expressed concern about the problem, and the former two listed China as an unfriendly business area in their annual reports, accusing it of dumping overseas while closing its own market.
The international community has been most critical of China’s “non-trade barriers.” Today, the anti-dumping war between China, the EU and the US is heating up and the issue of an undervalued yuan has also become a key problem in Sino-US relations.
The prevailing trends for Taiwanese businesspeople manufacturing in China, then, would appear to be an appreciation of the yuan, inflation and labor cost hikes, all of which reduce the advantage of low labor costs.
As the export market shrinks, a Chinese system that lacks transparency would give its domestic market to local businesses first. This is the reality of dealing with China, so these businessmen must proceed with caution.
WORLD ALIGNMENT
These difficulties suggest that Taiwan should align its Chinese business policy with the rest of the world’s and focus on resolving the structural obstacles.
In other words, “walking toward China through the world” rather than President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) constant China-centric dream of strengthening cross-strait economic integration. Such integration might expose Taiwan to the greater risks of association with China and force Taiwan to become embroiled in China’s economic conflicts with other countries.
Lai I-chung is an executive committee member of Taiwan Thinktank.
Translated by Eddy Chang
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused