The Department of Health deserves a round of applause for moving to amend the Emergency Medical Service Act (緊急醫療救護法) to make it mandatory for public facilities of a certain size to have portable Automated External Defibrillators (AEDs), and to exempt trained and untrained rescuers from legal liability if their efforts to save a life result in injury or death. These measures would go a long way in helping save lives, but there is more that could be done.
The department says 200,000 cardiac arrest patients are admitted to emergency rooms in Taiwan each year. The proposed amendments are aimed at encouraging bystanders to help if they see someone having a heart attack or who is injured.
Studies in the US, including one by doctors at the University of Washington, have found that more than 92 percent of people who suffer sudden cardiac arrest outside of hospitals do not survive to hospital discharge, and survival declines by 7 to 10 percent for each minute defibrillation is delayed.
A greater availability of AEDs — which are designed to be used by laypeople and provide verbal instructions for each stage of operation — have been proven to increase the survival rate of cardiac arrest victims. The devices monitor heart rhythms and administer electric shocks to restore a normal heartbeat.
The health department is encouraging private companies, universities and other organizations to buy AEDs and train their staff in emergency rescue procedures. However, AEDs should also become required for all schools — because children as well as adults can be victims of sudden cardiac arrest — as well as at beach lifeguard stations. The private sector, both business and civic organizations, should be encouraged to chip in to provide AEDs for facilities that can’t afford to buy them on their own.
However, AEDs alone are not enough; there has to be someone who can perform cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) as well. Greater efforts are needed nationwide to get the message across that people of all ages and all walks of life can learn CPR — and use it, as well as other basic life-saving skills..
In September 2007, the then-Taipei County Government sponsored a CPR training drill — an attempt to break a Guinness world record for the simultaneous performance of CPR — that drew 3,249 people, ranging in age from four to 97, as a way to mark the opening of the country’s First Aid Promotion Center. Then-Taipei County commissioner Chou Hsi-wei (周錫瑋) gave a sobering statistic in his speech at the event: Only 10 percent of attempts to save someone with CPR are successful in Taiwan, compared with 40 percent in the US.
Part of that 10 percent rate is certainly because too many people wait for an ambulance or fire department personnel to arrive and perform emergency rescue procedures, including CPR.
The Red Cross Society of the Republic of China offers classes in CPR and basic first aid and has trained tens of thousands of people since 2004. It is already working with the health department to promote CPR plus AED training. Many universities provide CPR classes for freshmen; schools at all levels should do the same.
Mary Newman, president of the Sudden Cardiac Arrest Foundation in the US, devised the “Cardiac Chain of Survival” metaphor in 1988. The chain — early access, early CPR, early defibrillation and early advanced cardiac life support — is one that everyone in Taiwan should know and support.
The health department hopes lawmakers can pass the AED-related amendments by the end of the year. Given that this is clearly one area where the blue-green divide should not apply, it would be good to pass them earlier. Lives could depend upon it.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the