Late last month, Wang Yi (王毅), director of China’s Taiwan Affairs Office, warned the US that selling arms to Taiwan would damage US-China relations. However, US President Barack Obama’s administration reiterated that US policy on arms sales to Taiwan would not change.
With the US presidential elections coming up, Obama is experiencing less support back home, just like President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in Taiwan, which has opened him up to attacks from opponents and interest groups. For example, 181 members of the US Congress signed a protest and blocked the appointment of William Burns as US undersecretary of state for political affairs to demand that US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton make an announcement on US arms sales to Taiwan by Oct. 1, especially the sale of F-16C/D aircraft.
The US, China and Taiwan each have their own plans when it comes to the F-16C/D issue. After having blocked the sale of F-16C/Ds to Taiwan in 2009, we can expect Beijing to continue pressuring Washington.
Washington, however, plans to let US Vice President Joe Biden, who will visit Beijing this month, talk Chinese leaders into accepting upgrades of existing F-16A/B aircraft as an alternative to the sale of F-16C/Ds. This move is against Washington’s “six assurances” to Taiwan, which state that the US will not discuss arms sales to Taiwan with China before their sale, and it shows the Obama administration is worried that US-China military exchanges will break down again, while at the same time it must pay attention to voters at home.
In Taiwan, election worries have made the Ma administration use the Mainland Affairs Council and the Ministry of National Defense as the “bad guys” pushing for the sale of F-16C/D jets and even diesel-electric submarines, making it seem as if the government is raising its hopes, when people with inside knowledge know full well that Ma only wants to upgrade our F-16A/B aircraft as a way of garnering more support in the election.
In the end, all Taiwan is likely to get are these upgrades. That would be a huge blow to both Taiwan-US relations and to the cross-strait military balance. The biggest difference between upgrading the existing F-16A/Bs and buying new F-16C/Ds is that a mere upgrade will mean that the number of fighters will remain the same, which will mean that Taiwan’s air defense capabilities will not increase in quantity.
Furthermore, even if Ma has openly urged the US to sell Taiwan F-16C/Ds 21 times over the past three years, his actions have belied his statements, which made Washington suspicious about his intentions to strengthen Taiwan’s defense capabilities.
Examples of such actions include a substantial lack of funds allocated to the defense budget, sitting around waiting for the US to agree before submitting letters of intent for military procurement, failing to deliver on his campaign promise that national defense spending would be 3 percent of GDP, as well as the recent remarks from a retired general who said that we should not differentiate between the Republic of China Army and the People’s Liberation Army because “we are all China’s army.”
On July 25, the Washington Times quoted an unnamed Obama official who said Taiwan has not lobbied very strongly for the sale of F-16C/D aircraft. The report also said the recent flight by a Chinese bomber that crossed the Taiwan Strait median line shows that Ma’s conciliation policy has been a failure.
Whatever weapons Washington sells Taipei will be merely symbolic, while Taiwan has lost a long-term view of national security because our shortsighted politicians only care about these things at election time.
Liu Shih-chung is a research fellow at the Taipei-based Taiwan Brain Trust.
Translated by Drew Cameron
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS