Opinion polls show the majority of people believe the indictment of former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) to be a matter of political manipulation and persecution because Lee’s talk about “ousting Ma to save Taiwan” has threatened President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) chances at re-election.
The “oust Ma to save Taiwan” mantra hits straight at the heart of the matter. It has frightened Ma, who has resorted to the political persecution of Lee.
That Ma has issued this judicial threat makes it clear that he is trying to eliminate anyone who promotes a Taiwanese identity.
Lee’s slogan sounds familiar. In the early 1970s, the US started to change its policies toward China, Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and his entourage were kicked out of the UN and the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) diplomacy collapsed.
The supporters of the traditional system of government lost momentum and Chiang’s son Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) became premier, putting in place a policy of “implementing reform to protect Taiwan,” employing ethnic Taiwanese and carrying out what US diplomats referred to as “Taiwanization.”
With the “implementing reform to protect Taiwan” strategy up and running, Lee, at the time a technical specialist at the Sino-American Joint Commission on Rural Reconstruction, was suddenly catapulted up several levels in the official ranks, and joined Chiang Ching-kuo’s Cabinet as a minister without portfolio.
It seems likely that Lee understood that this was linked to the political environment of the time and Chiang Ching-kuo’s efforts at “protecting Taiwan.”
Chiang Ching-kuo’s relying in “Taiwanization” to save Taiwan was criticized by his father’s former officials, who said it violated his father’s feudal idea that “gentlemen and thieves cannot coexist.”
However, movements to “save Taiwan” were, and still are, aimed precisely at stopping Taiwan from being swallowed up by “thieves.”
When Lee became president, he was even more active in carrying out democratization, localization and ending hostilities with China, and his interactions with China were based on the principle that Taiwan’s sovereignty and independence must not be harmed. The purpose was to “save Taiwan” and to make sure that it was not annexed by China.
After having experienced Chiang Ching-kuo’s attempts to save Taiwan through reform, Lee of course cannot agree with how Ma neglects consolidating a domestic consensus for democracy, human rights and the protection of Taiwan and instead does all he can to forge a “one China” consensus with China, which has greatly endangered Taiwan’s sovereign and independent status.
Chiang Kai-shek had no concept of democracy or nation and was fond of quoting ancient chancellor Zhu Geliang’s (諸葛亮) aforementioned saying about how “gentlemen and thieves cannot coexist.” Ma, who has received a modern democratic education, quotes the author of the centuries-old Chinese novel Romance of the Three Kingdoms, which says that “after a long split, a union will occur and after a long union, a split will occur.”
Ma is not committed to saving Taiwan and is more interested in accepting China’s “peaceful” annexation. The “oust Ma to save Taiwan” mantra is extremely powerful because it highlights how Ma has betrayed Chiang Ching-kuo, Lee and the vast majority of Taiwanese who are unwilling to see Taiwan annexed by China.
James Wang is a media commentator.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS