While most investors last week focused on the ongoing debt crisis in the eurozone and the standoff over the increase of the debt ceiling in the US, they should also be aware that Taiwan has its own fiscal problems.
The announcement by the Council for Economic Planning and Development on Monday that it approved a NT$216.6 billion (US$7.5 billion) budget for major public construction projects next year is an issue that deserves far more attention than it has so far received.
That number represents the lowest level in 10 years — and therefore a lower public spending contribution to the nation’s economy. In addition, the government’s budget office is reportedly only able to allot about NT$125.2 billion for top-priority projects, meaning that there will be a funding gap of NT$91.4 billion for public works next year, affecting about 96 percent of ongoing projects.
This funding gap for public construction projects did not occur overnight; it has happened almost every year for the past decade, but in the past the government always solved the problem by reallocating funds from its special budget to ensure the continuation of major infrastructure projects.
The importance of investing in infrastructure is self-evident: It creates jobs and drives up domestic investment in the short term, while developing opportunities for economic growth in the long term. Of the NT$216.6 billion budget for next year, transportation infrastructure projects account for about 53 percent, followed by agricultural projects at 9.3 percent and flood control and drainage plans at 6.7 percent, according to the council’s figures.
The funding gap for next year is raising concern because the government has already spent the four-year NT$500 billion special budget the Cabinet approved in 2009 to boost the slowing economy.
Like many other economies in the world, Taiwan adopted an aggressive fiscal policy to help stimulate economic growth during the post-global financial crisis era. By using funds from the special budget for a four-year NT$500 billion economic stimulus package, the government was able to allocate NT$369.3 billion for major infrastructure projects in 2009, NT$356 billion last year and NT$302.8 billion this year. Unfortunately, there is simply no money left for next year, according to the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics.
While it is reasonable to expect the government to pull back from its aggressive fiscal policy with the economy likely to grow 5.06 percent this year, the extent to which it has slashed the public works budget is reason for concern.
The immediate downside risk to the nation is a lower contribution to GDP and attracting less foreign investment.
If the budget cut were to reflect an effort to implement conservative and prudent policies while maintaining fiscal discipline, then that would constitute a step in right direction, but the government needs to proceed cautiously.
However, if the true reason for such a big cut in the public works budget is that the government needs to fund its pay hike for civil servants amid rising public debt and declining tax revenues, the obvious answer would be to cancel the pay raise for civil servants and increase taxes on the wealthy. However, few lawmakers and government officials are likely to have the stomach for that ahead of presidential and legislative elections in January.
The government could take different approaches to fill the funding gap, such as accelerating the auction of state-owned land, cutting spending in other areas or seeking private money to finance public projects, but a fundamental solution to the problem ultimately depends on the much needed reforms of the nation’s distorted tax and fiscal system — which needs real action now, not cosmetic change designed to cover up political imperatives.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
RSS