After the lifting of martial law, the number of media outlets in the country rapidly expanded and the media environment has become increasingly freer. In 2008, Taiwan’s press was ranked as the 32nd-freest in the world by Freedom House. That has remained Taiwan’s best ranking to date. After that, it has dropped continually — sinking to 43rd in 2009, 47th last year and 48th this year.
The 2009 Freedom House report pointed to increasing polarization in the country during the visit of Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林), adding that the main reason for the drop in Taiwan’s ranking was that representatives of government and nongovernmental organizations attempted to influence editorial content and attacked reporters.
The report also mentioned that the appointment of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) 2008 election campaign spokesperson Lo Chih-chiang (羅智強) as vice chairman of the Central News Agency (CNA) led to a marked decrease in reports that were critical of the government. Taiwanese media outlets often rely on CNA translations of reports from foreign news agencies, but with the agency leaving out negative comments about the Ma administration, the result was that other media also overlooked such reports.
Freedom House said Taiwan’s ranking dropped further last year because the Want Want Group, after acquiring the China Times Group, pressured the latter to cut down on reports that were critical of China and the Ma administration. Other media outlets also imposed self control or restraint when reporting on Tibet, Xinjiang and Falun Gong to avoid upsetting China. Freedom House expressed concern that commercial concerns would increasingly place Taiwanese media under China’s thumb.
Moreover, as the media environment deteriorated in the wake of the financial crisis, embedded advertising increased. The government’s widespread use of embedded advertising enhanced the risk of affecting reporting by media outlets afraid of offending the administration.
The nation’s ranking continued to fall this year because of increasingly polarized reporting on political parties, the Public Television System controversy and the continued rise in embedded advertising despite legislation making it illegal. The resignation of senior China Times reporter Dennis Huang (黃哲斌) further highlighted how serious the matter is. Control Yuan member Frank Wu (吳豐山) has issued a report and proposed corrective measures on the government’s and China’s embedded advertising.
If all the government, businesses and even China have to do to affect the news is to put up some money, can the public really know if the news they get is true or manipulated? What has happened to the public’s right to know?
Press freedom is an important link in a democracy. How can people find out the truth if reporters refuse to report it? How are we going to monitor the government effectively? The countries with the freest press in the world — Finland, Norway and Sweden — are free of corruption, which highlights why freedom of the press is important.
Hawang Shiow-duan is a professor of political science at Soochow University.
TRANSLATED BY PERRY SVENSSON
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (何立峰) are expected to meet this month in Paris to prepare for a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). According to media reports, the two sides would discuss issues such as the potential purchase of Boeing aircraft by China, increasing imports of US soybeans and the latest impacts of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. However, recent US military action against Iran has added uncertainty to the Trump-Xi summit. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) called the joint US-Israeli airstrikes and the
RSS