There were two reminders this week that the oft-touted Chinese bonanza that Taiwan was supposed to reap from the government’s steamroller drive toward closer cross-strait ties might not be quite the pot of gold so many have claimed or hoped. Despite its linguistic and cultural ties, it appears Taiwan is simply the latest country to be taken in by the “billion-dollar Chinese market” mirage.
The Tourism Bureau announced on Thursday that Chinese tourist arrivals were down 30 percent last month compared with June last year, while May had seen a 16 percent drop from the year before. A Ministry of Education official said 975 Chinese students would enroll at private universities for the fall semester, although 2,141 slots had been approved and schools had accepted 1,263.
Many reasons have been given for the reduction in tourists: everything from health and safety worries — the plasticizer scare and the Alishan (阿里山) derailment — to renewed competition from neighboring countries, while the low student turnout was blamed on a lack of publicity. More worrying was the comment from an associate professor at Tamkang University, who said more than 1,000 Chinese high schools had a single token graduate apply for a spot at a Taiwanese school — an indication that without pressure from Beijing, Taiwan might be seeing only 200 or 300 students this fall, if any.
However, the truth of the matter is that the number of potential tourists, just like the number of potential students, has always been unrealistic, as have the expectations that an influx of Chinese tourists would rejuvenate the economy.
Official statistics showed there were 1.63 million Chinese visitors last year, or an average of 4,560 a day — more than the 3,000 daily limit when Taiwan first opened its doors to Chinese tour groups in mid-2008, but a far cry from the revised quota of 7,200 or the 10,000 a day President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) once envisioned. Likewise, the launch of the Chinese free independent travel program is unlikely to achieve the touted 90,000 visitors by the end of this year.
When regular cross-strait charter flights were announced in June 2008, it turned out none of the Chinese airlines involved were interested in flights to Kaohsiung and only one wanted to fly to Hualien. Lawmakers and local leaders in central and southern Taiwan complained that they were being overlooked, but the truth was and is that what Chinese tourists want to see first are the big attractions — the National Palace Museum and Taipei 101 in Taipei, Alishan, Sun Moon Lake and Taroko Gorge. It is the same the world over — just as tourists to China head straight for the Forbidden City and the Great Wall, while visitors to Egypt focus on Cairo and the pyramids.
There are many other things to see in those countries, but when travelers are making their first visit to a country and time is short, they want to see the sites that everyone knows.
Ministry of Education and university officials, likewise, should not have been surprised that most of the Chinese students wanted to go to schools in Taipei and none were interested in National Penghu University of Science and Technology.
If Taiwan really wants to compete in the Chinese market, whether for tourists or students, it is going to have to tailor its offerings to what the Chinese want. That means accepting that Taipei will remain the top spot for first-time visitors.
However, Greater Kaohsiung Mayor Chen Chu’s (陳菊) idea of turning the Republic of China (ROC) Military Academy, the ROC Air Force Academy and the ROC Naval Academy in her city into must-sees for Chinese tourists should be left on the drawing board. The “special interest” Chinese tourists who would rush to see those institutions are probably not the ones we want to be encouraging.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS