In 2008, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) came into office with a solid majority in the legislature. Three years later, and observed from an international perspective, it is disappointing to see how few original and inspiring ideas Ma and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government have been able to generate in order to put Taiwan on the global stage. Instead, the KMT has revealed a worrying lack of global perspective in finding ways for Taiwan to further utilize its great potential to advance the nation’s industry and reduce its increasing dependence on China by cooperating with other advanced countries and regions, such as the US, Japan and the EU.
It appears that Taiwan’s ruling party has betrayed its fundamental duty to renew itself and in time formulate a “third way” forward for the nation. The KMT fails to move forward because the party is blinded by history and trapped in the past.
As a result, Taiwan is increasingly considered to be leaning toward China. Additionally, the US is currently debating if Taiwan is worth defending and the WHO has listed Taiwan as a province of China. Moreover, Taiwan’s hard-won trade status as an independent member of the WTO has been damaged by the signing of the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) with China as a non-governmental organization, not an independent, equal WTO partner.
The ECFA should have kicked the door to the world open, but Taiwan is becoming increasingly isolated, and is still not welcomed into international and regional free-trade agreements (FTA). A reality check: China now dictates to Taiwan that FTAs can only be obtained with countries with which China has an FTA, such as Singapore.
Despite the KMT’s intimate relations with China, it lacks the ability — or rather the willingness — to create a credible alternative to its current policies, which seem to go only one way: toward unification. It has chosen to ignore the fact that its policies are unsustainable and that they run contrary to the wishes of the vast majority of Taiwanese. More than 80 percent of Taiwanese say no to the “one country, two systems” principle no matter how it is formulated.
The alternative is a new, third way for Taiwan that will not deny its complex history, but allow a fresh, forward-looking approach to Chinese and other international relations. A third way should be both pragmatic and based on solid policies respecting Taiwanese sovereignty.
A third way, among other policies, should adopt an ambitious and active strategy that avoids Taipei’s isolation in regional and international FTAs and diminishes Taiwan’s increasing dependency on China.
Industrial interdependency between Taiwan and a broader set of countries will clearly reduce Taiwan’s risk of being isolated. This can be achieved if Taiwan promotes even closer cooperation with other advanced countries and increases its foreign direct investments. In this process, Taiwan should identify its core areas of expertise and keep these core parts of the industry at home, as Peter Chow (周鉅原) says in a forthcoming book this year at Routledge. In addition, Taiwan can enhance its financial service industry by cooperating more closely with the EU, as Copenhagen Economics has said.
By adopting a third way, Taiwan can develop into a leading player in technology and service products with less focus on products with low value. More research and innovation needs to be directed into new exciting products.
The KMT, with its vast legislative majority, has wasted four years, blinded by and trapped in an obsolete Republic of China perspective instead of looking at the pragmatics and real world of Taiwanese society of today.
Michael Danielsen is the chairman of Taiwan Corner.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS