According to REPORTS, the Ministry of National Defense will be planning next year’s budget for F-16C/D aircraft and submarines based on minimal operational requirements, reasoning that allocating money to incomplete procurement plans results in ineffective budgeting. While the ministry insists this does not mean Taiwan has given up on these two arms deals, the US says it will not sell arms to Taiwan because Taipei has not allocated an adequate arms purchase budget.
Beyond the issue of the sale of F-16C/D aircraft, this calls into question whether US arms sales in effect are about to be terminated and whether the third Sino-US communique of 1982 is starting to control US decisions to sell arms to Taiwan.
Some believe that even if F-16C/D aircraft are not purchased, they can be replaced by upgrades to F-16A/B aircraft. However, these two aircraft types differ in terms of mileage and ammunition. More importantly, the F-16C/D plan involves buying an additional 66 aircraft on top of the existing 146 F-16A/B aircraft, which means Taiwan would have more than 200 aircraft.
The plan for upgrading F-16A/B aircraft is merely aimed at improving the quality of existing aircraft, not increasing the total number. These are two different concepts and upgrading F-16A/B aircraft cannot replace the addition of new F-16C/D aircraft.
When in opposition, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) did everything it could to stop arms purchases. After President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) came into office, news spread that National Security Council Secretary-General Su Chi (蘇起) requested that the US slow arms sales to Taiwan before meetings between the Straits Exchange Foundation and China’s Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait. This caused the US to doubt whether the Ma administration attached importance to arms procurement and to think that it would not consider initiating arms sales as long as Taiwan did not allocate a budget.
Now that the ministry is drawing up the smallest budget possible, the US has even more reason not to deal with arms sales to Taiwan.
During a visit to China earlier this year, US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates mentioned that the US might consider cutting arms sales to Taiwan gradually each year. Then, during his trip to the US, Chinese Chief of General Staff Chen Bingde (陳炳德) mentioned China’s “red line” on arms sales to Taiwan. He also released news in a meeting with US senators that the Taiwan Relations Act might be amended, and during a press conference, US Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mike Mullen seemed disinterested in Taiwan.
These incidents imply that the third communique is beginning to control US arms sales to Taiwan. Taiwan must be more proactive in bringing things back inside the cross-strait military balance framework and preventing the military arms sales issue from being tied up to US-China or cross-strait relations.
Although the ministry’s actions are aimed at minimizing inefficient budgets, these actions send the dangerous message that Taipei does not care about arms sales while it is also a slap in the face to those 46 US senators who demanded that the US sell Taiwan F-16C/D aircraft.
After having solemnly pledged to buy F-16C/D aircraft and then reducing the necessary budget for doing so, the Ma government owes the Taiwanese an explanation. It needs to tell the nation whether this military procurement plan was a big joke and whether it has any strategies to deal with the increasing influence of the third Sino-US Communique on US arms sales to Taiwan.
Lai I-chung is an executive committee member of the Taiwan Thinktank.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS