Kudos to the Food and Drug Administration inspector surnamed Yang (楊) who on her own initiative took extra steps to examine problematic samples that subsequently led to the discovery of the chemical DEHP, an industrial plasticizer linked to a variety of health risks in humans, in several brands of soft drinks and dairy products.
However, as a number of Control Yuan members pointed out, many questions remain and investigations are needed to quell public concern over product safety.
Indeed, the latest incident exposed not just the shocking news of potentially harmful chemical additives in beverages and dairy products, but also suggested the existence of loopholes in the nation’s food safety system.
For example, if — as a supplier of emulsifying agent claimed — banned chemicals have been used for years, why didn’t the health authorities detect the illegal additives sooner?
If the Department of Health (DOH), as local media alleged, was made aware of the incident last month, why didn’t it issue warnings to consumers right away?
What about the responsibilities of beverage and dairy product companies? Claiming that they were unaware that the emulsifier contained DEHP said much about the quality control — or lack thereof — carried out by the companies themselves.
Granted the health authorities have up to now seized over 460,000 bottles of soft drinks, 20 tonnes of fruit and yogurt powder and 130,000 packets of tainted probiotic powder, and Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) did yesterday pledge to continue tracing tainted products and to hold the manufacturers accountable, but more aggressive and tougher measures need to be taken.
This will help prevent the reaction to the incident escalating into public panic. If no action is taken, consumer confidence in the government’s role of protecting its people’s health and well-being will be further undermined.
Many vividly recall the food scare caused by China’s melamine-tainted milk powder two years ago. To rid Taiwan’s public of its concerns at that time, the authorities announced that they would step up random checks of products from 5 percent to 20 percent.
Stricter measures were introduced on all imported products from countries labeled as high-risk, which now had to include melamine test reports from their country of origin before being subject to random testing in Taiwan.
As some health experts have warned that the latest food safety incident might generate greater impacts than that of the melamine scare two years ago, it’s imperative that the government swiftly conduct across-the-board inspections of the tainted products and draw up a protection fund for consumers.
It would be utterly irresponsible for the government to place the blame solely on private companies.
The latest food scare, as regrettable as it is, should serve as a lesson for the health authorities — and the companies, for that matter — that they must make much-needed improvements in food safety controls and strengthen inspection mechanisms to better safeguard the public’s health.
This is the only way they can win back the public’s trust and confidence.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS