Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) recent selection as the party’s candidate for next year’s presidential election represents a generational transition and demonstrates how the DPP is improving itself and moving further away from the outdated and continuously regressing Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
The ideals of the new generation are not entirely removed from the previous generation of leaders, but it is more focused on how to attain its ideals. Their different experiences mean that the new generation has a different style from the revolutionaries and “individual heroes” of the previous generation.
The subject of Tsai’s actions is not “I,” but “we.” Tsai is not bragging about what “she” can do for the DPP or Taiwan; rather, she is saying let “us” work together and contribute to Taiwan.
The DPP elders all have a background in the democratization movement, which they joined after suffering injustices during the KMT’s authoritarian rule that must have left deep emotional scars. It is normal for individual heroes to appear in such opposition movements, but a democratic political party that wants to rule must rely on unity and work together for a common goal.
The main players from the democratization movement era lacked opportunities to deal with international affairs. While they are not totally lacking when it comes to understanding the complex international environment Taiwan finds itself in, the new generation has mostly received a Western education and has had firsthand experience of mature Western democracies. It is more familiar with the decision-making processes of democratic governments and is better equipped in its capacity of holding power and carrying out reform.
The DPP’s basic nature and the ideals and actions of its new generation offer a stark contrast to the actions of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and the KMT’s return to authoritarian leanings. The DPP emphasizes democracy and equality, while the KMT focuses on authority and domination.
The new generation of DPP leaders does not discriminate based on geographical location or gender and it is concerned with developing a society based on fair competition and looking after disadvantaged groups. Ma’s KMT, on the other hand, seems to be returning to its old Leninist ways.
The DPP has had a female vice president and now has a female presidential candidate, while the KMT continues to view women as mere decoration who are only there to meet quotas. The DPP nominated a presidential candidate based on fair competition, whereas Ma is the KMT’s only presidential candidate. The subject of nominating someone else was not even allowed to be discussed and all members of the KMT’s Central Standing Committee clapped their hands like children as they approved Ma’s nomination.
Ma’s party-state system is based on a concept of “me doing what I want” — “me” referring to a person who is infected with “eventual unification” disease, who is incompetent and who acts against the public will.
The new generation of the DPP uses the word “us” to refer to Taiwan as a nation, demonstrating a recognition of it, as well as our link to this land. It hopes to unite Taiwan and establish a democratic nation based on fair competition.
With one party embodying a return to dictatorship and one representing the advancement of democracy, the KMT and DPP are as different as chalk and cheese.
James Wang is a commentator based in Taipei.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS