What happens when comic book meets ideology? Answer: An absurd distortion of history. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government has exemplified that in the most blatant way with its recent publication of a comic book history of the Republic of China’s (ROC) military.
The Ministry of National Defense on Tuesday launched the comic book, titled Eternal Glory, and meant to illustrate the grandeur of the ROC military’s might and perseverance as part of the KMT government’s celebration of the ROC’s centennial. The comic, however, dexterously managed to totally omit any mention of former presidents Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁).
Even though Lee and Chen’s years of governance combined takes up one-fifth of the ROC’s 100-year history, the ministry said its 280-page comic book did not have enough room to include every president. And yet, with the limited number of pages as claimed by the ministry, it somehow brilliantly managed to mention President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who is merely in the third year of his presidency.
To be fair, the ministry deserves some kudos for wanting to connect with young people by coming up with the idea of a comic book to introduce the military’s gore and glory to the nation’s youngsters.
However, as it looks unlikely that the ministry would publish a sequel to Eternal Glory called The Missing 20 Years, elaborating on the history of the nation’s military under Lee’s and Chen’s presidencies, it is absolutely despicable that the ministry used taxpayers’ money for a publication that presents a distorted version of history. The distorting of historic facts in the comic book could also be seen as a violation of the principle of administrative neutrality.
Indeed, how convincing does the ministry expect the comic book to be if it depicts the evolution of the ROC’s military without a mention of Chen’s governance, under whose eight-year presidency the task of nationalizing the military was accomplished, a move that mirrored the nation’s democratization?
The level of destruction and damage caused by the massive earthquake on Sept. 21, 1999, resulted in far more devastation than the flood brought by Typhoon Morakot in August 2009, and Lee’s role as the president at the time of the 921 Earthquake disaster, during which he issued an executive order to activate an emergency decree, is without doubt more worthy of mention than the relatively small role played by Ma during the Morakot flooding.
The advanced weaponry the nation acquired under Lee’s and Chen’s presidencies is worth at least a mention, but this appeared to be lost in the ministry’s depiction of the nation’s military history.
So much for the ministry’s statement at the press conference on Tuesday held to launch the comic book that “staying true to history” was the approach it took when creating the comic.
This brings to mind how the KMT, when in opposition during Chen’s presidency, used to accuse the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) of ruling the country by ideology, describing the administration’s work promoting Taiwanese consciousness as “de-Sinicization” (去中國化).
The KMT government appears to have taken “rule by ideology” to another level by unashamedly editing out historic facts from the comic book in line with partisan bias.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS