The second-generation National Health Insurance (NHI) plan proposed by the Department of Health addresses more than just the problem of funding the NHI: It is concerned with the entire NHI system, including its structure, the reform of medical care, revenue resources, balancing revenues and expenditure and so on — seven major issues altogether — of which the financing of the system is just one. Nevertheless, the second-generation NHI plan has been bogged down over the single issue of funding.
In order to deal with the problem of inadequate funding sources, the planned second-generation NHI will change the basis for calculating premiums from salary to income. Additionally, the concept of household income is adopted by the plan as a means of resolving the problem of the unequal burden borne by the six different categories of insured people.
The idea of changing the premium calculation from salary to income seems to be acceptable to the general public and to political commentators. Everyone seems to agree with the idea of making people who have non-salary income pay a little more in NHI premiums. However, when it comes to the details of the implementation, there have been endless arguments.
All the unfair aspects of income tax have been brought up for discussion in relation to the second-generation NHI. The nation’s healthcare reform has somehow become a matter of tax reform. However, the Bureau of National Health Insurance (BNHI) is not the National Tax Administration, so how can it be expected to take on the onerous task of tax reform? The health insurance bureau can only collect premiums according to income as defined in the Income Tax Act (所得稅法) and on the basis of data provided by the tax administration.
Let’s not forget that the NHI is a social insurance scheme with the purpose of sharing the risks associated with illness; it is not a welfare program. In theory, everyone should pay health insurance premiums, but because this is a social insurance scheme, it incorporates the concept of paying according to one’s financial capacity.
The idea of basing the NHI plan on household income is grounded in an ideal, but it is certain to run up against questions of wealth distribution — and redistribution of wealth is a matter of tax reform. The health insurance bureau is not able to take on such an onerous responsibility and it is in no way obliged to do so.
If total household income is taken as the basis for calculating insurance premiums, people will get the impression that it is a tax. In a taxation system, those who have no income do not have to pay tax, even though many people who appear to have no income actually do have money coming in — it’s just that they get their income through the underground economy, so there is no record of it.
In an insurance system, on the other hand, the user pays. Even those who have no income have to pay insurance premiums. If the notion that those who have no income do not have to pay tax were applied to the NHI, the health insurance bureau would lose NT$1.5 trillion (US$51.5 billion) a year in premiums according to estimates of the amount of premiums paid by people with no income.
If this shortfall in contributions had to be made up for entirely by people with incomes, 75 percent of it would be borne by salary earners — and the fairness of this would be debatable. That is why the Department of Health plans to collect a minimum premium. However, the idea of a minimum -premium has been sullied by the notion of a “virtual income.” A system of contributions based on household incomes has to be accompanied by one of minimum premiums in order prevent salary earners from suffering negatively.
If a system of contributions based on total household income is adopted, the greatest impact will be on people with high incomes and on salary earners, so it is necessary to collect a minimum premium from people with no income in order to reduce the impact on salary earners. The current amended version of the second-generation NHI plan incorporates fewer changes to the existing system than originally planned.
People with high incomes that are earned from other means than salaries, will pay an extra 2 percent supplementary premium, while the basic premium rate will be reduced so that salary earners are not adversely affected. Nevertheless, disparities between the six categories of insured people will remain.
No system is perfect and without drawbacks. Health insurance reform is sure to continue as time goes by, but it can’t be expected to take on the burden of tax reform. As long as progress can be made to make the funding of the NHI more fair than it was under the first--generation plan, it should go ahead.
Yeh Ching-chuan is a professor at Tzu Chi University’s Department of Public Health.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
The bird flu outbreak at US dairy farms keeps finding alarming new ways to surprise scientists. Last week, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) confirmed that H5N1 is spreading not just from birds to herds, but among cows. Meanwhile, media reports say that an unknown number of cows are asymptomatic. Although the risk to humans is still low, it is clear that far more work needs to be done to get a handle on the reach of the virus and how it is being transmitted. That would require the USDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to get
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
On April 11, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida delivered a speech at a joint meeting of the US Congress in Washington, in which he said that “China’s current external stance and military actions present an unprecedented and the greatest strategic challenge … to the peace and stability of the international community.” Kishida emphasized Japan’s role as “the US’ closest ally.” “The international order that the US worked for generations to build is facing new challenges,” Kishida said. “I understand it is a heavy burden to carry such hopes on your shoulders,” he said. “Japan is already standing shoulder to shoulder
Former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) used to push for reforms to protect Taiwan by adopting the “three noes” policy as well as “Taiwanization.” Later, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) wished to save the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) by pushing for the party’s “localization,” hoping to compete with homegrown political parties as a pro-Taiwan KMT. However, the present-day members of the KMT do not know what they are talking about, and do not heed the two former presidents’ words, so the party has suffered a third consecutive defeat in the January presidential election. Soon after gaining power with the help of the KMT’s