Taiwan’s only problem in trying to participate in events organized by international organizations is the fact that China has its hands around Taiwan’s throat. If China let go, Taiwan would be able to freely choose which events it would participate in according to the rules of each international organization.
China, however, does not think this way and instead demands that Taiwan “talk to” Beijing before engaging in any type of international activity, including taking part in non-governmental organizations. According to China, this means gaining permission from and being told what to do by Beijing based on the “one China” principle.
Taiwan’s government does not know how to handle this situation. In the recent meeting on the sidelines of the APEC summit between Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) and Taiwanese envoy Lien Chan (連戰), which was referred to as a meeting between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), the diplomatically challenged Lien did not respond to the demands that Taiwan “talk to” China by clearly stating Taiwan’s position: China has to release its grip on Taiwan’s throat if it wants Taiwan to talk to anyone at all.
This is a common problem across President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) whole administration. Their acceptance of the “one China” principle has resulted in a slave mentality that makes them “swallow” anything China tells them to do. None of the government’s actions are aimed at upholding Taiwan’s national dignity and all they know how to do is “swallow” every insult. Once the “one China” view becomes the universally accepted truth around the world, Taiwan will simply be “swallowed” up by China.
By not having a regular membership in international organizations when meeting with other national leaders at international conferences and by turning meetings between Taiwanese and Chinese officials into a “KMT-CCP platform,” the Ma government undermines Taiwan’s national dignity by highlighting its own decay and proving that it does not care about Taiwan’s sovereign interests.
The KMT likes to compare Taiwan with Singapore and likes to say that if Singapore can do something, then there is no reason why Taiwan shouldn’t be able to do the same. However, the cleverness and intellectual sensitivity of people like Ma and Lien is very different from that of former Singaporean president Lee Kuan Yew (李光耀) and the way he protected Singapore’s sovereign status.
In 1976, before Lee took up an invite to visit China, he first made a visit to then-US ambassador to Singapore John Holdridge to ask for his advice on how to conduct talks with Beijing. Lee has said that while he understands Chinese, he always used English in his dealings with China because speaking Chinese would lead China into thinking that Singapore is part of China.
Lee has stressed that Singapore is not a part of China, that it is a different nation and Beijing therefore had to acknowledge that fact.
When Lien meets with Hu to ask for permission to talk to others, they are both able to chat freely using their native language and this of course strengthens China’s belief that Taiwan is a part of China and that it in the end will “swallow” Taiwan up piece by piece.
James Wang is a media commentator.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US